V.RAMAN AND ANOTHER vs V.CHANDRA AND 4 OTHERS — 254/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--Compromised on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR010022802024

Filing Number

915/2024

Filing Date

16-Aug-2024

Registration No

254/2024

Registration Date

10-Sep-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Karur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Compromised

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1
Ia/2/2025 Classification : 5 of Limitation Act Section V.CHANDRA AND 4 OTHERS
Ia/3/2025 Classification : Restoration Petition Section V.RAMAN AND ANOTHERV.RAJASEKARAN
Ia/4/2026 Classification : Petition to Set-aside Exparte Order or Decree Section V.RAMAN AND ANOTHER
Ia/5/2026 Classification : Petition to Set-aside Exparte Order or Decree Section V.LAKSHMANAN
Ia/6/2026 Classification : Petition to Set-aside Exparte Order or Decree Section V.RAMAN AND ANOTHER
Ia/7/2026 Classification : Petition to Set-aside Exparte Order or Decree Section V.RAMAN AND ANOTHER
Ia/8/2026 Classification : Amendment Petition Section V.CHANDRA AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.V.RAMAN AND ANOTHER

    Adv. P.NAGULSAMY

  2. 2.V.LAKSHMANAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.V.CHANDRA AND 4 OTHERS

  2. 2.V.RAJASEKARAN

  3. 3.V.NEELAVENI

  4. 4.M.RATHI

  5. 5.M.LAKSHMI

  6. 6.V.SATHIYA BAMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The District & Sessions Court, Karur decreed the suit filed by V. Raman and another against V. Chandra and 4 others on the basis of a compromise settlement reached between the parties. The court approved the compromise petition and incorporated it into the final decree, thereby resolving the dispute through mutual agreement rather than contested adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  6. 21-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    District Judge

  7. 15-Apr-2026

    Amendment

    District Judge

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    District Judge

  9. 18-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    District Judge

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    District Judge

  11. 11-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    District Judge

  12. 06-Mar-2026

    Issues

    District Judge

  13. 05-Mar-2026

    Issues

    District Judge

  14. 02-Mar-2026

    Issues

    District Judge

  15. 24-Feb-2026

    Issues

    District Judge

  16. 20-Feb-2026

    Issues

    District Judge

  17. 17-Feb-2026

    Issues

    District Judge

  18. 16-Feb-2026

    Issues

    District Judge

  19. 12-Feb-2026

    Issues

    District Judge

  20. 06-Feb-2026

    Issues

    District Judge

  21. 03-Feb-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Judge

  22. 22-Jan-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Judge

  23. 12-Jan-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Judge

  24. 12-Jan-2026

    Restored

    District Judge

  25. 12-Jan-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Judge

  26. 24-Apr-2025

    Disposed

    District Judge

  27. 17-Apr-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Judge

  28. 03-Apr-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Judge

  29. 01-Mar-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Judge

  30. 01-Feb-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Judge

  31. 10-Jan-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Judge

  32. 10-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  33. 12-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  34. 22-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  35. 10-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 16-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 254/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Sessions Court, Karur decreed the suit filed by V. Raman and another against V. Chandra and 4 others on the basis of a compromise settlement reached between the parties. The court approved the compromise petition and incorporated it into the final decree, thereby resolving the dispute through mutual agreement rather than contested adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case