DSP, KARUR TOWN vs S.PREMKUMAR — 11/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 109,302,120(b),506(ii),294(b),212. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
SPL.SC - Special Sessions Case
CNR: TNKR010021962023
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1430/2023
Filing Date
14-07-2023
Registration No
11/2023
Registration Date
14-07-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Karur
Judge
1-District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DSP (Deputy Superintendent of Police), KARUR TOWN
Adv. SPECIAL PP
Respondent(s)
S.PREMKUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 15-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 01-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 18-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgement |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Spl.S.C.No.11/2023, Karur District Court Date: 25.10.2025 Outcome: The court extensively examined witness PW.13 (Udayakumar) regarding a criminal investigation into a homicide case. The order documents detailed cross-examination about crime scene investigation procedures, evidence collection, witness statements, and procedural compliance. The judge found serious deficiencies in the investigation, including improper removal of accused Ajithkumar, inadequate documentation, failure to collect proper forensic evidence, and bias toward caste-based considerations rather than substantive criminal investigation. The court expressed that proper investigative procedures were not followed and that the investigation appeared influenced by political pressure rather than factual evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Spl.S.C.No.11/2023, Karur District Court Date: 25.10.2025 Outcome: The court extensively examined witness PW.13 (Udayakumar) regarding a criminal investigation into a homicide case. The order documents detailed cross-examination about crime scene investigation procedures, evidence collection, witness statements, and procedural compliance. The judge found serious deficiencies in the investigation, including improper removal of accused Ajithkumar, inadequate documentation, failure to collect proper forensic evidence, and bias toward caste-based considerations rather than substantive criminal investigation. The court expressed that proper investigative procedures were not followed and that the investigation appeared influenced by political pressure rather than factual evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts