R.PARAMASIVAM vs R.SATHIYAMOORTHI AND ANOTHER Advocate - P.KATHIRVEL — 195/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR010021712023

Filing Number

747/2023

Filing Date

28-Jul-2023

Registration No

195/2023

Registration Date

04-Aug-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Karur

Judge

1-District Judge

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R.PARAMASIVAM

    Adv. K.SENTHILKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R.SATHIYAMOORTHI AND ANOTHER Advocate - P.KATHIRVEL

  2. 2.P.PALANISAMY

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

    Summary of Case 195/2023 In this property dispute, defendant Sathiyamoorthi testified on June 12, 2026 regarding a land sale transaction with petitioner Paramasivam. The court recorded testimony about a power-of-attorney deed (December 4, 1995), subdivision of property (December 10, 1995), and a sale agreement dated March 3, 2023 for Rs. 30,78,575. The defendant acknowledged receiving an advance payment of Rs. 25,78,575 but denied not completing the sale registration despite opportunities and alleged the petitioner provided sufficient funds for the remaining balance of Rs. 5,00,000. The District Judge of Karur examined and recorded the witness statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  6. 08-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  7. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  8. 20-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  9. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  10. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  11. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  12. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  13. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  14. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  15. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  16. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  17. 18-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  18. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  19. 05-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Judge

  20. 10-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  21. 19-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  22. 18-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  23. 24-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  24. 25-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  25. 12-Mar-2025

    Issues

    District Judge

  26. 29-Jan-2025

    Issues

    District Judge

  27. 17-Dec-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  28. 19-Nov-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  29. 16-Oct-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  30. 29-Aug-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  31. 26-Jul-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  32. 19-Jun-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  33. 10-Apr-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  34. 27-Feb-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  35. 24-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  36. 18-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  37. 16-Nov-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Judge

  38. 12-Oct-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Judge

  39. 11-Sep-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Judge

  40. 04-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 28-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 195/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 195/2023 In this property dispute, defendant Sathiyamoorthi testified on June 12, 2026 regarding a land sale transaction with petitioner Paramasivam. The court recorded testimony about a power-of-attorney deed (December 4, 1995), subdivision of property (December 10, 1995), and a sale agreement dated March 3, 2023 for Rs. 30,78,575. The defendant acknowledged receiving an advance payment of Rs. 25,78,575 but denied not completing the sale registration despite opportunities and alleged the petitioner provided sufficient funds for the remaining balance of Rs. 5,00,000. The District Judge of Karur examined and recorded the witness statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case