T.SENTHILSRINIVASAN vs B.SUMATHI AND 2 OTHERS — 167/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7,R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR010019832023
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
693/2023
Filing Date
12-07-2023
Registration No
167/2023
Registration Date
12-07-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Karur
Judge
1-District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T.SENTHILSRINIVASAN
Adv. P.PREMKUMAR
Respondent(s)
B.SUMATHI AND 2 OTHERS
S.SUBHA
T.SARAVANAN
Adv. T.RAVIKUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this Tamil civil case (A.V. No. 167/2023) dated 07.04.2026, the District Court of Karur examined witness testimony regarding a property dispute involving ancestral and partition matters. The court recorded the witness's statements regarding property partition dated 04.12.1940, settlement documents executed on 11.11.2020 and 18.12.2020, and the plaintiff's right to reside in the disputed property with the permission of the defendant. The order documents the witness examination and cross-examination proceedings, with the court noting discrepancies in the witness's testimony regarding the nature of the property and settlement arrangements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this Tamil civil case (A.V. No. 167/2023) dated 07.04.2026, the District Court of Karur examined witness testimony regarding a property dispute involving ancestral and partition matters. The court recorded the witness's statements regarding property partition dated 04.12.1940, settlement documents executed on 11.11.2020 and 18.12.2020, and the plaintiff's right to reside in the disputed property with the permission of the defendant. The order documents the witness examination and cross-examination proceedings, with the court noting discrepancies in the witness's testimony regarding the nature of the property and settlement arrangements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts