K.BALSAMY vs R.KANDASAMY (DIED) (AMENDED AS PER ORDER IN IA.NO.4/2025 DT 22.09. — 1000094/2018
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR010013402018
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1001106/2018
Filing Date
10-10-2018
Registration No
1000094/2018
Registration Date
10-10-2018
Court
Principal District Court, Karur
Judge
1-District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.BALSAMY
Adv. E.K.KUMARESAN
Respondent(s)
R.KANDASAMY (DIED) (AMENDED AS PER ORDER IN IA.NO.4/2025 DT 22.09.
K.RAMESH
NISHOTH
NIKSHITHA
S.NIRMALA
PALANIYAMMAL (AMENDED AS PER ORDER IN IA.NO.04/2025 DT 22.09.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil suit (A.V. No. 94/2018) from the Principal District Court, Karur, dated February 16, 2026. The court recorded the plaintiff Balusami's examination-in-chief testimony under Section 95 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, wherein the plaintiff produced various documentary evidence including settlement agreements from 2010, a bank release certificate from Union Bank of India, and correspondence with defendants. The court admitted all marked exhibits (Exhibits 1-10) and the plaintiff prayed for a decree based on the evidence presented; the case stands adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil suit (A.V. No. 94/2018) from the Principal District Court, Karur, dated February 16, 2026. The court recorded the plaintiff Balusami's examination-in-chief testimony under Section 95 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, wherein the plaintiff produced various documentary evidence including settlement agreements from 2010, a bank release certificate from Union Bank of India, and correspondence with defendants. The court admitted all marked exhibits (Exhibits 1-10) and the plaintiff prayed for a decree based on the evidence presented; the case stands adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts