B RAJKUMAR AND TWO OTHERS vs T V RAMASAMY AND ANOTHER ONE Advocate - EXPARTY — 257/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,141,163AAND166. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNKR010013282025
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
22-04-2025
Filing Number
487/2025
Filing Date
22-04-2025
Registration No
257/2025
Registration Date
14-07-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Karur
Judge
1-District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
B RAJKUMAR AND TWO OTHERS
Adv. Mutharasu S
B CHANDRAKANTHAN
Adv. Mutharasu S
SEETHADEVI
Adv. Mutharasu S
Respondent(s)
T V RAMASAMY AND ANOTHER ONE Advocate - EXPARTY
THE BRANCH MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD,KARUR
Adv. P.THANGAVEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Orders
Orders
Evidence
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Orders | |
| 02-04-2026 | Orders | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-03-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 09-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
The Principal District Court, Karur, in MCOP No.257/2025 (dated March 24, 2026), admitted the affidavit statement of witness Saranya as primary evidence under Section 95 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, as requested by the petitioner. During cross-examination by the opposite party (respondent), the witness provided testimony regarding a bus accident in which her grandmother died, attributing fault to the bus driver's negligence rather than the grandmother's carelessness. The court accepted the witness testimony and the petition was allowed as prayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District Court, Karur, in MCOP No.257/2025 (dated March 24, 2026), admitted the affidavit statement of witness Saranya as primary evidence under Section 95 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, as requested by the petitioner. During cross-examination by the opposite party (respondent), the witness provided testimony regarding a bus accident in which her grandmother died, attributing fault to the bus driver's negligence rather than the grandmother's carelessness. The court accepted the witness testimony and the petition was allowed as prayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts