B RAJKUMAR AND TWO OTHERS vs T V RAMASAMY AND ANOTHER ONE Advocate - EXPARTY — 257/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,141,163AAND166. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKR010013282025

Orders

Next Hearing

28th April 2026

e-Filing Number

22-04-2025

Filing Number

487/2025

Filing Date

22-04-2025

Registration No

257/2025

Registration Date

14-07-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Karur

Judge

1-District Judge

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 140,141,163AAND166

Petitioner(s)

B RAJKUMAR AND TWO OTHERS

Adv. Mutharasu S

B CHANDRAKANTHAN

Adv. Mutharasu S

SEETHADEVI

Adv. Mutharasu S

Respondent(s)

T V RAMASAMY AND ANOTHER ONE Advocate - EXPARTY

THE BRANCH MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD,KARUR

Adv. P.THANGAVEL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge

16-04-2026

Orders

02-04-2026

Orders

24-03-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Enquiry

09-03-2026

Enquiry

Interim Orders

24-03-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence / Deposition

The Principal District Court, Karur, in MCOP No.257/2025 (dated March 24, 2026), admitted the affidavit statement of witness Saranya as primary evidence under Section 95 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, as requested by the petitioner. During cross-examination by the opposite party (respondent), the witness provided testimony regarding a bus accident in which her grandmother died, attributing fault to the bus driver's negligence rather than the grandmother's carelessness. The court accepted the witness testimony and the petition was allowed as prayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District Court, Karur, in MCOP No.257/2025 (dated March 24, 2026), admitted the affidavit statement of witness Saranya as primary evidence under Section 95 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, as requested by the petitioner. During cross-examination by the opposite party (respondent), the witness provided testimony regarding a bus accident in which her grandmother died, attributing fault to the bus driver's negligence rather than the grandmother's carelessness. The court accepted the witness testimony and the petition was allowed as prayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Karur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case