R Palanisamy vs S Samiappan — 59/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151,O21R38. Status: Stay. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNKR010011932024
e-Filing Number
11-04-2024
Filing Number
467/2024
Filing Date
26-Apr-2024
Registration No
59/2024
Registration Date
29-Apr-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Karur
Judge
1-District Judge
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.R Palanisamy
Adv. KALAISELVAN M
Respondent(s)
-
1.S Samiappan
Case History
-
10-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
Stay
District Judge
-
16-Apr-2026
Stay
District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Stay
District Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Stay
District Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Stay
District Judge
-
18-Dec-2025
Batta
District Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Batta
District Judge
-
12-Nov-2025
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
District Judge
-
29-Oct-2025
Batta
District Judge
-
16-Oct-2025
Batta
District Judge
-
18-Sep-2025
Batta
District Judge
-
18-Aug-2025
Batta
District Judge
-
07-Aug-2025
Orders
District Judge
-
05-Aug-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
01-Aug-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
29-Jul-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
22-Jul-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
04-Jul-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
03-Jul-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
26-Jun-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
24-Jun-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
19-Jun-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
17-Jun-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
13-Jun-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
03-Jun-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
29-Apr-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
25-Apr-2025
Orders
District Judge
-
17-Apr-2025
Orders
District Judge
-
16-Apr-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
15-Apr-2025
Ea Pending
District Judge
-
09-Apr-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
08-Apr-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
02-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Judge
-
26-Mar-2025
Ea Pending
District Judge
-
17-Mar-2025
Ea Pending
District Judge
-
05-Mar-2025
Ea Pending
District Judge
-
14-Feb-2025
Ea Pending
District Judge
-
05-Feb-2025
Ea Pending
District Judge
-
29-Jan-2025
Ea Pending
District Judge
-
08-Jan-2025
Ea Pending
District Judge
-
11-Dec-2024
Ea Pending
District Judge
-
06-Dec-2024
Ea Pending
District Judge
-
04-Dec-2024
Ea Pending
District Judge
-
28-Nov-2024
Ea Pending
District Judge
-
20-Nov-2024
Orders
District Judge
-
15-Nov-2024
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: E.P.59/2024 in OS.64/2016 Date: 15.11.2024 The court rejected the petitioner R Palanisamy's contentions regarding property ownership, income claims, and alleged business dealings of the respondent S Samiappan. The court found all assertions made by the petitioner to be incorrect and held that the original case (OS.65/2016) had already been disposed of, making the current petition without merit. The petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Nov-2024
Evidence
District Judge
-
13-Nov-2024
Evidence
District Judge
-
25-Oct-2024
Evidence
District Judge
-
18-Oct-2024
Evidence
District Judge
-
27-Sep-2024
Evidence
District Judge
-
20-Sep-2024
Evidence
District Judge
-
13-Sep-2024
Evidence
District Judge
-
06-Sep-2024
Evidence
District Judge
-
30-Aug-2024
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
30-Aug-2024
Evidence
District Judge
-
23-Aug-2024
Counter
District Judge
-
16-Aug-2024
Counter
District Judge
-
05-Aug-2024
Counter
District Judge
-
29-Jul-2024
Counter
District Judge
-
19-Jul-2024
Ea Pending
District Judge
-
12-Jul-2024
Enquiry
District Judge
-
27-Jun-2024
Enquiry
District Judge
-
29-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 59/2024
Case Summary: E.P.59/2024 in OS.64/2016 Date: 15.11.2024 The court rejected the petitioner R Palanisamy's contentions regarding property ownership, income claims, and alleged business dealings of the respondent S Samiappan. The court found all assertions made by the petitioner to be incorrect and held that the original case (OS.65/2016) had already been disposed of, making the current petition without merit. The petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts