CANARA BANK, REP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, KARUR vs K.SAMSON AND ANOTHER — 4/2026
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 01st April 2026.
COS - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: TNKR010011502023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
416/2023
Filing Date
11-04-2023
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
13-04-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Karur
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed with cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CANARA BANK, REP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, KARUR
Adv. P.THANGAVEL
Respondent(s)
K.SAMSON AND ANOTHER
L.KANDASAMY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
The court recorded the testimony of the defendant, a practicing doctor, who admitted to borrowing ₹2,74,000 as an educational loan from the bank and acknowledged signing documents (Exhibits 3, 4, 5) related to the loan, though she disputed certain claims about additional jewelry loans and income tax compliance. The judge found the defendant's testimony credible regarding the principal loan amount and documented signatures, while rejecting her denials on ancillary claims, ultimately deciding the case in accordance with the bank's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court recorded the testimony of the defendant, a practicing doctor, who admitted to borrowing ₹2,74,000 as an educational loan from the bank and acknowledged signing documents (Exhibits 3, 4, 5) related to the loan, though she disputed certain claims about additional jewelry loans and income tax compliance. The judge found the defendant's testimony credible regarding the principal loan amount and documented signatures, while rejecting her denials on ancillary claims, ultimately deciding the case in accordance with the bank's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts