K.RAGUNATHAN AND 2 OTHERS vs K.PERAPPA KONAR AND 8 OTHERS Advocate - M.JEYARAMAN — 88/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 09th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR010011232023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
407/2023
Filing Date
10-04-2023
Registration No
88/2023
Registration Date
10-04-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Karur
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.RAGUNATHAN AND 2 OTHERS
Adv. T.RAVIKUMAR
R.SUBASHINI
R.KARTHIK
Respondent(s)
K.PERAPPA KONAR AND 8 OTHERS Advocate - M.JEYARAMAN
S.MALLIKA
Adv. M.JEYARAMAN
P.RAMESH
Adv. M.JEYARAMAN
K.PALANISAMY
Adv. R.SUDHARSAN
P.NAGARAJ
Adv. R.SUDHARSAN
P.DURAISAMY
Adv. R.SUDHARSAN
P.VIJAYALAKSHMI
Adv. R.SUDHARSAN
K.KAMALAM
Adv. S.HARIHARAN
R.PALANIYAMMAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 08-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 25-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgement |
Interim Orders
The District Court of Karur (Case No. 88/2023, dated 02.02.2026) ruled on a property dispute involving joint family assets. The court decided that Schedule B properties, though purchased individually by certain family members, must be treated as joint family property since they were acquired from income generated by Schedule A properties, and therefore should be divided into 5 shares rather than 3 among the family members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District Court of Karur (Case No. 88/2023, dated 02.02.2026) ruled on a property dispute involving joint family assets. The court decided that Schedule B properties, though purchased individually by certain family members, must be treated as joint family property since they were acquired from income generated by Schedule A properties, and therefore should be divided into 5 shares rather than 3 among the family members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts