K.RAGUNATHAN AND 2 OTHERS vs K.PERAPPA KONAR AND 8 OTHERS Advocate - M.JEYARAMAN — 88/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR010011232023

Filing Number

407/2023

Filing Date

10-Apr-2023

Registration No

88/2023

Registration Date

10-Apr-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Karur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed without cost

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1
Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2),27(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.RAGUNATHAN AND 2 OTHERS

    Adv. T.RAVIKUMAR

  2. 2.R.SUBASHINI

  3. 3.R.KARTHIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K.PERAPPA KONAR AND 8 OTHERS Advocate - M.JEYARAMAN

  2. 2.S.MALLIKA

    Adv. M.JEYARAMAN

  3. 3.P.RAMESH

    Adv. M.JEYARAMAN

  4. 4.K.PALANISAMY

    Adv. R.SUDHARSAN

  5. 5.P.NAGARAJ

    Adv. R.SUDHARSAN

  6. 6.P.DURAISAMY

    Adv. R.SUDHARSAN

  7. 7.P.VIJAYALAKSHMI

    Adv. R.SUDHARSAN

  8. 8.K.KAMALAM

    Adv. S.HARIHARAN

  9. 9.R.PALANIYAMMAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Judge

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Judge

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Judge

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Judge

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Judge

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Judge

  9. 05-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Judge

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Judge

  11. 23-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    District Judge

  12. 11-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge

  13. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  14. 09-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

    The District Court of Karur (Case No. 88/2023, dated 02.02.2026) ruled on a property dispute involving joint family assets. The court decided that Schedule B properties, though purchased individually by certain family members, must be treated as joint family property since they were acquired from income generated by Schedule A properties, and therefore should be divided into 5 shares rather than 3 among the family members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  16. 06-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  17. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  18. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  19. 09-Jan-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  20. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  21. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge

  22. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge

  23. 27-Nov-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  24. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge

  25. 14-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  26. 14-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  27. 17-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  28. 26-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  29. 22-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  30. 19-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  31. 15-Apr-2025

    Mediation

    District Judge

  32. 03-Apr-2025

    Mediation

    District Judge

  33. 20-Feb-2025

    Mediation

    District Judge

  34. 18-Feb-2025

    Issues

    District Judge

  35. 12-Feb-2025

    Issues

    District Judge

  36. 29-Jan-2025

    Issues

    District Judge

  37. 17-Dec-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  38. 19-Nov-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  39. 16-Oct-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  40. 27-Aug-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  41. 25-Jul-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  42. 18-Jun-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  43. 24-Apr-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  44. 20-Mar-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  45. 13-Feb-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  46. 03-Jan-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  47. 12-Dec-2023

    Issues

    District Judge

  48. 28-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  49. 07-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  50. 01-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  51. 26-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  52. 23-Aug-2023

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  53. 25-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  54. 20-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  55. 10-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 10-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 88/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The District Court of Karur (Case No. 88/2023, dated 02.02.2026) ruled on a property dispute involving joint family assets. The court decided that Schedule B properties, though purchased individually by certain family members, must be treated as joint family property since they were acquired from income generated by Schedule A properties, and therefore should be divided into 5 shares rather than 3 among the family members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case