S.KANNAMMAL AND 2 OTHERS vs N.NALLAMMAL AND 33 OTHERS — 102/2021
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR010010092021
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
479/2021
Filing Date
28-04-2021
Registration No
102/2021
Registration Date
03-06-2021
Court
Principal District Court, Karur
Judge
1-District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.KANNAMMAL AND 2 OTHERS
Adv. T.RAVIKUMAR
V.LOGANAYAKI
M.NANDHINI
Respondent(s)
N.NALLAMMAL AND 33 OTHERS
N.MURUGESAN
M.N.GOPALAN
S.SARASWATHI
K.CHITHAMBARAM
C.ARUN
C.PARTHEEBAN
P.MALLIKA
P.SATHEHISH
P.CHINTHAMANI
R.PAPPATHI
T.NATCHAMMAL
P.SARASWATHI
Adv. K.GANESAN
S.PRABHA NALLUSAMY
Adv. K.GANESAN
K.THEIVAMANI
R.SELVARANI
S.DHANDAPANI
V.SARAVANAN
M.SAMIYATHAL
A.VIJAYALAKSHMI
R.SAKTHIVEL
R.GOPALAKRISHNAN
C.BOSAN
K.THANAGAVEL
K.SAKTHIVEL
S.ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA
A.DHANASINGH
Adv. K.JOTHI SUTHARSAN
P.GUNASEKARAN
K.NATARAYAN
G.VALARMATHI
V.SANGEETHA
R.REVATHI
P.SAKTHIVEL
K.SRASU
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 08-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 17-03-2026 | Judgement |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: A.V. No. 102/2021 Date: 24.11.2025 Court: District Court, Karur Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish their claim to 1/3 share of survey nos. 113 and 115 (totaling 16 acres 35 cents) in Emoor village through documentary evidence. The court rejected their arguments regarding partition (1980) and land allocation (1985), noting lack of proper documentation and credible evidence of ownership. The court held that plaintiffs are entitled to only 1/6 share of the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: A.V. No. 102/2021 Date: 24.11.2025 Court: District Court, Karur Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish their claim to 1/3 share of survey nos. 113 and 115 (totaling 16 acres 35 cents) in Emoor village through documentary evidence. The court rejected their arguments regarding partition (1980) and land allocation (1985), noting lack of proper documentation and credible evidence of ownership. The court held that plaintiffs are entitled to only 1/6 share of the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts