R.PALANIYAMMAL AND 4 OTHERS vs A.ESWARI AND ANOTHER — 129/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 141,166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKR010008932023

Evidence

Next Hearing

23rd April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

324/2023

Filing Date

21-03-2023

Registration No

129/2023

Registration Date

27-04-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Karur

Judge

1-District Judge

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 141,166
IA/3/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section R.PALANIYAMMAL AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner(s)

R.PALANIYAMMAL AND 4 OTHERS

Adv. K.SURESH

S.POONKODI

M.ESWARI

R.RAJENDRAN

R.ILAIYARAJA

Respondent(s)

A.ESWARI AND ANOTHER

M/S. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. TRICHY REP BY BRANCH MANAGER

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge

25-03-2026

Evidence

23-03-2026

Evidence

18-03-2026

Evidence

09-03-2026

Evidence

07-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

23-02-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence / Deposition

Summary This is a civil case (MCOP No. 129/2023) from the Principal District Court, Karur, concerning a fatal accident. The court recorded witness testimony from a third party on February 23, 2026, regarding an incident where a person named Ramasamy died after being hit by a vehicle on a dirt road near his house. The witness statement was admitted as evidence, and the court cross-examined the opposing party's account of the accident circumstances, ultimately accepting the plaintiff's evidence and granting relief as requested in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a civil case (MCOP No. 129/2023) from the Principal District Court, Karur, concerning a fatal accident. The court recorded witness testimony from a third party on February 23, 2026, regarding an incident where a person named Ramasamy died after being hit by a vehicle on a dirt road near his house. The witness statement was admitted as evidence, and the court cross-examined the opposing party's account of the accident circumstances, ultimately accepting the plaintiff's evidence and granting relief as requested in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Karur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case