M.Chandrasekar vs S.Periyasamy — 59/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(2)(A). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CRLA - Criminal Appeal

CNR: TNKR010006732024

e-Filing Number

03-02-2024

Filing Number

383/2024

Filing Date

03-Feb-2024

Registration No

59/2025

Registration Date

27-Feb-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Karur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(2)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M.Chandrasekar

    Adv. Prakash N

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S.Periyasamy

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 59/2025 Court Decision: The District Sessions Judge dismissed M. Chandrasekar's appeal and confirmed his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Chandrasekar was convicted for issuing a cheque for Rs. 6,00,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds, and sentenced to one year simple imprisonment plus Rs. 6,00,000 compensation (with additional one month imprisonment if unpaid within 30 days). Key Reasoning: The court found that Chandrasekar failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act. Despite claiming the cheque was given as security for a Rs. 1,00,000 loan and alleging misuse, he produced no documentary evidence to support his defense, did not respond to the legal notice, and made contradictory claims during cross-examination. The complainant fulfilled all statutory requirements for a Section 138 complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    District Judge

  5. 03-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge

  7. 22-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge

  8. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge

  9. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge

  10. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge

  12. 12-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge

  13. 05-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge

  14. 06-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge

  15. 08-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge

  16. 04-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge

  17. 06-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge

  18. 04-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge

  19. 04-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge

  20. 15-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge

  21. 24-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge

  22. 27-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 03-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 59/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 59/2025 Court Decision: The District Sessions Judge dismissed M. Chandrasekar's appeal and confirmed his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Chandrasekar was convicted for issuing a cheque for Rs. 6,00,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds, and sentenced to one year simple imprisonment plus Rs. 6,00,000 compensation (with additional one month imprisonment if unpaid within 30 days). Key Reasoning: The court found that Chandrasekar failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act. Despite claiming the cheque was given as security for a Rs. 1,00,000 loan and alleging misuse, he produced no documentary evidence to support his defense, did not respond to the legal notice, and made contradictory claims during cross-examination. The complainant fulfilled all statutory requirements for a Section 138 complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case