K.SOLIYAMMAL vs S.LAKSHMI AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - K.SUBRAMANIAN — 13/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 03-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR010001702023

Filing Number

53/2023

Filing Date

11-Jan-2023

Registration No

13/2023

Registration Date

11-Jan-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Karur

Judge

1-District Judge

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.SOLIYAMMAL

    Adv. N.THIRUMOORTHY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S.LAKSHMI AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - K.SUBRAMANIAN

  2. 2.M.SANTHI

    Adv. K.SUBRAMANIAN

  3. 3.R.ELAKKIYA

    Adv. K.SUBRAMANIAN

  4. 4.R.SURESH

    Adv. K.SUBRAMANIAN

Case History

  1. 03-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  8. 05-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

    This is a Tamil language civil court order from the District Court in Karur (Case No. 13/2023, dated 05.02.2026). The document records the cross-examination testimony of a witness (Shaliyammaal) in a property dispute case involving agricultural land. Summary: The court conducted cross-examination of the plaintiff witness regarding disputed agricultural land (mava property). The court found that the plaintiff has not satisfactorily proven exclusive possession and enjoyment of the land since 1995, as the defendant's brother Selmutt and his heirs have been in possession and cultivation since that period. The court ruled that since 1995, the defendants have maintained possession of the land, and therefore the plaintiff's claim for cancellation of the defendant's title and removal of encumbrance should be decided based on the principles established regarding possession and the 1995 family settlement arrangement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  10. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  11. 21-Jan-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  12. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  13. 15-Dec-2025

    List / Special List

    District Judge

  14. 25-Nov-2025

    List / Special List

    District Judge

  15. 14-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  16. 14-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  17. 16-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  18. 16-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  19. 10-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  20. 25-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  21. 12-Mar-2025

    Issues

    District Judge

  22. 29-Jan-2025

    Issues

    District Judge

  23. 17-Dec-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  24. 19-Nov-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  25. 16-Oct-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  26. 27-Aug-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  27. 25-Jul-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  28. 18-Jun-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  29. 24-Apr-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  30. 12-Mar-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  31. 29-Jan-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  32. 13-Dec-2023

    Issues

    District Judge

  33. 31-Oct-2023

    Issues

    District Judge

  34. 12-Sep-2023

    Issues

    District Judge

  35. 31-Aug-2023

    Issues

    District Judge

  36. 23-Aug-2023

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  37. 25-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  38. 26-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  39. 15-Jun-2023

    Amendment

    District Judge

  40. 13-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  41. 05-Apr-2023

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  42. 28-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  43. 11-Jan-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 11-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13/2023

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Tamil language civil court order from the District Court in Karur (Case No. 13/2023, dated 05.02.2026). The document records the cross-examination testimony of a witness (Shaliyammaal) in a property dispute case involving agricultural land. Summary: The court conducted cross-examination of the plaintiff witness regarding disputed agricultural land (mava property). The court found that the plaintiff has not satisfactorily proven exclusive possession and enjoyment of the land since 1995, as the defendant's brother Selmutt and his heirs have been in possession and cultivation since that period. The court ruled that since 1995, the defendants have maintained possession of the land, and therefore the plaintiff's claim for cancellation of the defendant's title and removal of encumbrance should be decided based on the principles established regarding possession and the 1995 family settlement arrangement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case