K.SOLIYAMMAL vs S.LAKSHMI AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - K.SUBRAMANIAN — 13/2023

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR010001702023

Evidence

Next Hearing

03rd June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

53/2023

Filing Date

11-01-2023

Registration No

13/2023

Registration Date

11-01-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Karur

Judge

1-District Judge

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section O7R1
IA/5/2026 Classification : Petition to Receive Document Section K.SOLIYAMMALM.SANTHI

Petitioner(s)

K.SOLIYAMMAL

Adv. N.THIRUMOORTHY

Respondent(s)

S.LAKSHMI AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - K.SUBRAMANIAN

M.SANTHI

Adv. K.SUBRAMANIAN

R.ELAKKIYA

Adv. K.SUBRAMANIAN

R.SURESH

Adv. K.SUBRAMANIAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge

15-04-2026

Evidence

01-04-2026

Evidence

23-03-2026

Evidence

09-03-2026

Evidence

23-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

05-02-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence / Deposition

This is a Tamil language civil court order from the District Court in Karur (Case No. 13/2023, dated 05.02.2026). The document records the cross-examination testimony of a witness (Shaliyammaal) in a property dispute case involving agricultural land. Summary: The court conducted cross-examination of the plaintiff witness regarding disputed agricultural land (mava property). The court found that the plaintiff has not satisfactorily proven exclusive possession and enjoyment of the land since 1995, as the defendant's brother Selmutt and his heirs have been in possession and cultivation since that period. The court ruled that since 1995, the defendants have maintained possession of the land, and therefore the plaintiff's claim for cancellation of the defendant's title and removal of encumbrance should be decided based on the principles established regarding possession and the 1995 family settlement arrangement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Tamil language civil court order from the District Court in Karur (Case No. 13/2023, dated 05.02.2026). The document records the cross-examination testimony of a witness (Shaliyammaal) in a property dispute case involving agricultural land. Summary: The court conducted cross-examination of the plaintiff witness regarding disputed agricultural land (mava property). The court found that the plaintiff has not satisfactorily proven exclusive possession and enjoyment of the land since 1995, as the defendant's brother Selmutt and his heirs have been in possession and cultivation since that period. The court ruled that since 1995, the defendants have maintained possession of the land, and therefore the plaintiff's claim for cancellation of the defendant's title and removal of encumbrance should be decided based on the principles established regarding possession and the 1995 family settlement arrangement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Karur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case