R.Rajeshkumar, S/o.Rose Reddy vs The Management, Hyundai Wia India Private Limited Advocate - Prem Balaji — 89/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A(2). Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 12th August 2026.
ID - Industrial Disputes
CNR: TNKP180002712024
Filing Number
270/2024
Filing Date
14-Sep-2024
Registration No
89/2024
Registration Date
09-Oct-2024
Court
Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Last updated 14-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.R.Rajeshkumar, S/o.Rose Reddy
Adv. T.Ramkumar, A.Rekha, U.Manohar, B.Manikavasaham
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Management, Hyundai Wia India Private Limited Advocate - Prem Balaji
Case History
-
12-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Jul-2026
Copy of Order
Case 89/2024 Summary Petitioner: R. Rajeshkumar (Employee) Respondent: Hyundai Wia India Private Limited (Management) Outcome: The petitioner's petition was ALLOWED. The court set aside the termination order dated 23.04.2024 and ordered the management to reinstate the petitioner to his position with back wages, continuity of service, arrears, gratuity, and other benefits. Key Finding: The court found that the dismissal charges against the petitioner were baseless and unsubstantiated. The internal inquiry was deemed defective and procedurally flawed, and the petitioner was denied natural justice. The management's action was held to be arbitrary and contrary to principles of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Jul-2026
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
12-Jun-2026
Orders
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
01-Jun-2026
Arguments
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
15-May-2026
Arguments
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
05-May-2026
Arguments
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
28-Apr-2026
Arguments
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
08-Apr-2026
Arguments
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
26-Mar-2026
Arguments
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
16-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
03-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
23-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
18-Feb-2026
Oral Evidence
-
18-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
11-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
03-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
05-Jan-2026
Oral Evidence
-
05-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
02-Dec-2025
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
12-Nov-2025
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
15-Oct-2025
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
15-Sep-2025
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
11-Aug-2025
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
15-Jul-2025
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
25-Jun-2025
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
16-May-2025
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
30-Apr-2025
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
03-Apr-2025
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
27-Mar-2025
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
05-Mar-2025
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
04-Feb-2025
Written Statement
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
30-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
28-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
-
09-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 89/2024
Case 89/2024 Summary Petitioner: R. Rajeshkumar (Employee) Respondent: Hyundai Wia India Private Limited (Management) Outcome: The petitioner's petition was ALLOWED. The court set aside the termination order dated 23.04.2024 and ordered the management to reinstate the petitioner to his position with back wages, continuity of service, arrears, gratuity, and other benefits. Key Finding: The court found that the dismissal charges against the petitioner were baseless and unsubstantiated. The internal inquiry was deemed defective and procedurally flawed, and the petitioner was denied natural justice. The management's action was held to be arbitrary and contrary to principles of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts