The Secretary, Chennai Export Office Staffs and General Labour Union vs Sea Hydro Systems India Pvt.Ltd., Sriperumbudur Advocate - Mr.R.Jayaprakash, Mr.R. Karthik — 80/2021
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10(1)(2). Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
ID - Industrial Disputes
CNR: TNKP180002112021
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
211/2021
Filing Date
09-07-2021
Registration No
80/2021
Registration Date
09-07-2021
Court
Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Secretary, Chennai Export Office Staffs and General Labour Union
Adv. Mr.J.Prathaban
Respondent(s)
Sea Hydro Systems India Pvt.Ltd., Sriperumbudur Advocate - Mr.R.Jayaprakash, Mr.R. Karthik
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Judgement |
| 07-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 80/2021 Petitioner: The Secretary, Chennai Export Office Staffs and General Labour Union Respondent: Sea Hydro Systems India Pvt. Ltd., Sriperumbudur Court: Labour Court, Kancheepuram Date: 18.02.2026 Outcome: The case was adjourned for further hearing. The Presiding Officer noted unresolved disputes regarding worker grading, salary components (DA allowance, HRA), shift allowances, and the union's recognition status. The court found insufficient evidence on record regarding the employer's MSME classification, wage structures, and alleged grievances raised by the union. The matter requires further investigation and clarification from both parties before a final determination can be made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 80/2021 Petitioner: The Secretary, Chennai Export Office Staffs and General Labour Union Respondent: Sea Hydro Systems India Pvt. Ltd., Sriperumbudur Court: Labour Court, Kancheepuram Date: 18.02.2026 Outcome: The case was adjourned for further hearing. The Presiding Officer noted unresolved disputes regarding worker grading, salary components (DA allowance, HRA), shift allowances, and the union's recognition status. The court found insufficient evidence on record regarding the employer's MSME classification, wage structures, and alleged grievances raised by the union. The matter requires further investigation and clarification from both parties before a final determination can be made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts