The General Secretary, Uzhaipor Urimai Iyakkam vs The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering Advocate - Kandasamy — 41/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2k. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 04th May 2026.
ID - Industrial Disputes
CNR: TNKP180001892025
Filing Number
189/2025
Filing Date
06-06-2025
Registration No
41/2025
Registration Date
06-06-2025
Court
Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The General Secretary, Uzhaipor Urimai Iyakkam
Adv. S.Kumarasamy
Respondent(s)
The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering Advocate - Kandasamy
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Disposed
Orders
For further Proceedings
Written Statement
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-04-2026 | Orders |
| 02-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 12-03-2026 | Written Statement |
| 26-02-2026 | Written Statement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 41/2025 The Labor Court of Kanchipuram ruled that the union's grievance challenging the 30-day suspension order issued to employee M. Thyagarajan by Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering cannot be decided without witness and documentary evidence from both parties. The court found it inappropriate to render a final decision on the merits of the suspension based solely on the government's referral memorandum, and therefore dismissed the union's petition as not justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 41/2025 The Labor Court of Kanchipuram ruled that the union's grievance challenging the 30-day suspension order issued to employee M. Thyagarajan by Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering cannot be decided without witness and documentary evidence from both parties. The court found it inappropriate to render a final decision on the merits of the suspension based solely on the government's referral memorandum, and therefore dismissed the union's petition as not justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts