G.Dinakaran vs The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering, Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar — 41/2021
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 14th May 2026.
ID - Industrial Disputes
CNR: TNKP180001572021
Filing Number
157/2021
Filing Date
12-03-2021
Registration No
41/2021
Registration Date
19-03-2021
Court
Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Decision Date
14th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
G.Dinakaran
Adv. Mr.S.Kumarasamy, Mr.K.Bharathi, Mr.K.Suresh
Respondent(s)
The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering, Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-05-2026 | Judgement |
| 22-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 41/2021 (G. Dinakaran v. Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering) The Labour Court awarded G. Dinakaran lumpsum compensation of Rs. 40,000 in lieu of reinstatement, finding his probationary termination on 27.08.2019 was unjustified due to lack of credible performance appraisal documentation despite management's claims of unsatisfactory performance. The court ruled that while employers may terminate probationers, such decisions must be non-arbitrary and properly documented with evidence, which the management failed to provide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 41/2021 (G. Dinakaran v. Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering) The Labour Court awarded G. Dinakaran lumpsum compensation of Rs. 40,000 in lieu of reinstatement, finding his probationary termination on 27.08.2019 was unjustified due to lack of credible performance appraisal documentation despite management's claims of unsatisfactory performance. The court ruled that while employers may terminate probationers, such decisions must be non-arbitrary and properly documented with evidence, which the management failed to provide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts