A.Gopi vs The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering, Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar — 40/2021
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 14th May 2026.
ID - Industrial Disputes
CNR: TNKP180001562021
Filing Number
156/2021
Filing Date
12-03-2021
Registration No
40/2021
Registration Date
19-03-2021
Court
Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Decision Date
14th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A.Gopi
Adv. Mr.S.Kumarasamy, Mr.K.Bharathi, Mr.K.Suresh
Respondent(s)
The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering, Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-05-2026 | Judgement |
| 22-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case I.D.No. 40/2021 (A.Gopi) The Labour Court awarded A.Gopi (age 27) a lump-sum compensation of Rs.40,000 in lieu of his reinstatement claim against Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering. The court found that while Gopi completed probation on 01.10.2019 under Model Standing Orders, he was terminated on 27.08.2019 citing unsatisfactory performance. The court ruled the termination legally questionable due to lack of documentary evidence (performance appraisal forms) supporting poor performance claims and found the employer failed to follow fair procedures, though it declined full reinstatement and back wages as a compromise solution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case I.D.No. 40/2021 (A.Gopi) The Labour Court awarded A.Gopi (age 27) a lump-sum compensation of Rs.40,000 in lieu of his reinstatement claim against Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering. The court found that while Gopi completed probation on 01.10.2019 under Model Standing Orders, he was terminated on 27.08.2019 citing unsatisfactory performance. The court ruled the termination legally questionable due to lack of documentary evidence (performance appraisal forms) supporting poor performance claims and found the employer failed to follow fair procedures, though it declined full reinstatement and back wages as a compromise solution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts