L.Imayavaramban vs The Management, Matherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar — 36/2021
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th May 2026.
ID - Industrial Disputes
CNR: TNKP180001522021
Filing Number
152/2021
Filing Date
12-03-2021
Registration No
36/2021
Registration Date
19-03-2021
Court
Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Decision Date
13th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
L.Imayavaramban
Adv. S.Kumarasamy, K.Bharathi, K.Suresh, J.Mohan Raj
Respondent(s)
The Management, Matherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 36/2021 Summary The Labour Court rejected nine petitioners' claims for reinstatement, awarding each Rs. 75,000 compensation instead. The petitioners, who were terminated on 27.08.2019 citing poor performance during probation at Motherson Automotive, claimed victimization for union strike activities. The court found the employer failed to produce performance appraisals or disciplinary records substantiating poor performance claims, yet upheld probation terminations as contractually valid under certified standing orders, denying reinstatement but granting modest compensation as a goodwill gesture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 36/2021 Summary The Labour Court rejected nine petitioners' claims for reinstatement, awarding each Rs. 75,000 compensation instead. The petitioners, who were terminated on 27.08.2019 citing poor performance during probation at Motherson Automotive, claimed victimization for union strike activities. The court found the employer failed to produce performance appraisals or disciplinary records substantiating poor performance claims, yet upheld probation terminations as contractually valid under certified standing orders, denying reinstatement but granting modest compensation as a goodwill gesture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts