D.Manikandan vs The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering, Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar — 34/2021
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 14th May 2026.
ID - Industrial Disputes
CNR: TNKP180001502021
Filing Number
150/2021
Filing Date
12-03-2021
Registration No
34/2021
Registration Date
19-03-2021
Court
Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Decision Date
14th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
D.Manikandan
Adv. Mr.S.Kumarasamy, Mr.K.Bharathi, Mr.K.Suresh
Respondent(s)
The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering, Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-05-2026 | Judgement |
| 22-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 34/2021 - D. Manikandan v. Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering The Labour Court rejected D. Manikandan's claim for reinstatement with full back wages, finding the termination during probation was permissible under certified standing orders despite lack of documentary evidence of poor performance. However, the court awarded him lumpsum compensation of Rs.30,000 in the interest of justice, holding that the company failed to produce performance appraisal forms or improvement plans to justify the termination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 34/2021 - D. Manikandan v. Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering The Labour Court rejected D. Manikandan's claim for reinstatement with full back wages, finding the termination during probation was permissible under certified standing orders despite lack of documentary evidence of poor performance. However, the court awarded him lumpsum compensation of Rs.30,000 in the interest of justice, holding that the company failed to produce performance appraisal forms or improvement plans to justify the termination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts