S.Surendar vs The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering, Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar — 30/2021

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 14th May 2026.

ID - Industrial Disputes

CNR: TNKP180001462021

Case disposed

Filing Number

146/2021

Filing Date

12-03-2021

Registration No

30/2021

Registration Date

19-03-2021

Court

Labour Court, Kancheepuram

Judge

1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

Decision Date

14th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 Section 2A(2)

Petitioner(s)

S.Surendar

Adv. Mr.S.Kumarasamy, Mr.K.Bharathi, Mr.K.Suresh

Respondent(s)

The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering, Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

14-05-2026

Disposed

13-05-2026

Judgement

22-04-2026

Judgement

16-04-2026

Arguments

06-04-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

14-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: I.D. No. 30/2021 - S. Surendar vs. Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering The Labour Court ruled that while the petitioner's termination during probation was technically permissible under certified standing orders, the management failed to produce performance appraisals or evidence substantiating poor performance claims. Accordingly, the court awarded lumpsum compensation of Rs.40,000 in lieu of reinstatement, back wages, and other benefits, with 9% annual interest if unpaid within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.D. No. 30/2021 - S. Surendar vs. Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering The Labour Court ruled that while the petitioner's termination during probation was technically permissible under certified standing orders, the management failed to produce performance appraisals or evidence substantiating poor performance claims. Accordingly, the court awarded lumpsum compensation of Rs.40,000 in lieu of reinstatement, back wages, and other benefits, with 9% annual interest if unpaid within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Labour Court, Kancheepuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case