T.Vignesh, S/o.Tamil Mani vs The Management, Matherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar — 29/2021
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th May 2026.
ID - Industrial Disputes
CNR: TNKP180001452021
Filing Number
145/2021
Filing Date
12-03-2021
Registration No
29/2021
Registration Date
18-03-2021
Court
Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Decision Date
13th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T.Vignesh, S/o.Tamil Mani
Adv. S.Kumarasamy, K.Bharathi, K.Suresh, J.Mohan Raj
Respondent(s)
The Management, Matherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: ID.29/2021 (T.Vignesh v. Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering) Court Decision: The Labour Court rejected the petitioner's claim for reinstatement but awarded lumpsum compensation of Rs.75,000 as a token relief. The court found the termination was not adequately justified—the management failed to produce performance appraisals, conduct proper disciplinary procedures, or provide warnings before termination, though it technically complied with probation termination provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: ID.29/2021 (T.Vignesh v. Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering) Court Decision: The Labour Court rejected the petitioner's claim for reinstatement but awarded lumpsum compensation of Rs.75,000 as a token relief. The court found the termination was not adequately justified—the management failed to produce performance appraisals, conduct proper disciplinary procedures, or provide warnings before termination, though it technically complied with probation termination provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts