N.Vinothkumar vs The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering, Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar — 27/2021
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 14th May 2026.
ID - Industrial Disputes
CNR: TNKP180001432021
Filing Number
143/2021
Filing Date
12-03-2021
Registration No
27/2021
Registration Date
18-03-2021
Court
Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Decision Date
14th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
N.Vinothkumar
Adv. Mr.S.Kumarasamy, Mr.K.Bharathi, Mr.K.Suresh
Respondent(s)
The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering, Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-05-2026 | Judgement |
| 22-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Industrial Dispute Case I.D.No.27/2021 N. Vinothkumar v. Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering The Labour Court rejected 18 consolidated claims by probationary workers terminated on 27.08.2019, awarding compensation instead of reinstatement. The court found the employer failed to produce performance appraisals or evidence substantiating poor performance claims, but acknowledged the workers were still on probation without permanent status confirmation. Each petitioner received Rs.30,000-40,000 lump-sum compensation with 9% interest for non-payment, rather than their sought back wages and full reinstatement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Industrial Dispute Case I.D.No.27/2021 N. Vinothkumar v. Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering The Labour Court rejected 18 consolidated claims by probationary workers terminated on 27.08.2019, awarding compensation instead of reinstatement. The court found the employer failed to produce performance appraisals or evidence substantiating poor performance claims, but acknowledged the workers were still on probation without permanent status confirmation. Each petitioner received Rs.30,000-40,000 lump-sum compensation with 9% interest for non-payment, rather than their sought back wages and full reinstatement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts