Sarankumar vs The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar — 25/2021

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 14th May 2026.

ID - Industrial Disputes

CNR: TNKP180001412021

Case disposed

Filing Number

141/2021

Filing Date

12-03-2021

Registration No

25/2021

Registration Date

18-03-2021

Court

Labour Court, Kancheepuram

Judge

1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

Decision Date

14th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 Section 2A(2)

Petitioner(s)

Sarankumar

Adv. Mr.S.Kumarasamy, Mr.K.Bharathi, Mr.K.Suresh

Respondent(s)

The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

14-05-2026

Disposed

13-05-2026

Judgement

22-04-2026

Judgement

16-04-2026

Arguments

06-04-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

14-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: I.D.No.25/2021 (Sarankumar v. Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering) The Labour Court rejected claims by 18 petitioners who sought reinstatement after termination on 27.08.2019, but awarded lumpsum compensation instead. The court found the terminations occurred during probation without adequate documentation of poor performance, yet declined to order reinstatement. Each petitioner received ₹30,000-₹40,000 compensation with 9% interest if unpaid within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.D.No.25/2021 (Sarankumar v. Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering) The Labour Court rejected claims by 18 petitioners who sought reinstatement after termination on 27.08.2019, but awarded lumpsum compensation instead. The court found the terminations occurred during probation without adequate documentation of poor performance, yet declined to order reinstatement. Each petitioner received ₹30,000-₹40,000 compensation with 9% interest if unpaid within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Labour Court, Kancheepuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case