N.Asar Ahamathu vs The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering, Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar — 24/2021
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 14th May 2026.
ID - Industrial Disputes
CNR: TNKP180001402021
Filing Number
140/2021
Filing Date
12-03-2021
Registration No
24/2021
Registration Date
18-03-2021
Court
Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Decision Date
14th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
N.Asar Ahamathu
Adv. Mr.S.Kumarasamy, Mr.K.Bharathi, Mr.K.Suresh
Respondent(s)
The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering, Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-05-2026 | Judgement |
| 22-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: ID.No.24/2021 - N. Azar Ahamad v. Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering The Labour Court, Kancheepuram awarded compensation of Rs. 40,000 to petitioner N. Azar Ahamad and 17 other workmen terminated by Motherson Automotive Technologies, finding the dismissals lacked sufficient performance documentation despite termination during probation. The court found management failed to produce performance appraisals or evidence supporting poor performance claims, ruling termination was not adequately justified and ordering lump-sum compensation in lieu of reinstatement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: ID.No.24/2021 - N. Azar Ahamad v. Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering The Labour Court, Kancheepuram awarded compensation of Rs. 40,000 to petitioner N. Azar Ahamad and 17 other workmen terminated by Motherson Automotive Technologies, finding the dismissals lacked sufficient performance documentation despite termination during probation. The court found management failed to produce performance appraisals or evidence supporting poor performance claims, ruling termination was not adequately justified and ordering lump-sum compensation in lieu of reinstatement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts