A.Poovarasan vs The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar — 21/2021
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 14th May 2026.
ID - Industrial Disputes
CNR: TNKP180001372021
Filing Number
137/2021
Filing Date
12-03-2021
Registration No
21/2021
Registration Date
18-03-2021
Court
Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Decision Date
14th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A.Poovarasan
Adv. Mr.S.Kumarasamy, Mr.K.Bharathi, Mr.K.Suresh,
Respondent(s)
The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-05-2026 | Judgement |
| 22-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case ID 21/2021 - A. Poovarasan v. Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering The Labour Court awarded A. Poovarasan and 17 co-workers compensation of Rs. 30,000-40,000 each instead of full reinstatement after finding their termination during probation was unjustified. Although the workers were technically still on probation when terminated on 27.08.2019, the court held the employer failed to produce performance appraisals or documentation supporting claimed poor performance. The court found the terminations occurred shortly after a strike notice and constituted unfair labor practice, though it granted compromise compensation rather than full back wages and reinstatement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case ID 21/2021 - A. Poovarasan v. Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering The Labour Court awarded A. Poovarasan and 17 co-workers compensation of Rs. 30,000-40,000 each instead of full reinstatement after finding their termination during probation was unjustified. Although the workers were technically still on probation when terminated on 27.08.2019, the court held the employer failed to produce performance appraisals or documentation supporting claimed poor performance. The court found the terminations occurred shortly after a strike notice and constituted unfair labor practice, though it granted compromise compensation rather than full back wages and reinstatement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts