V.Raji vs The Management, Matherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar — 20/2021
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 13th May 2026.
ID - Industrial Disputes
CNR: TNKP180001362021
Filing Number
136/2021
Filing Date
12-03-2021
Registration No
20/2021
Registration Date
18-03-2021
Court
Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Decision Date
13th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
V.Raji
Adv. Mr.S.Kumarasamy, Mr.K.Bharathi, Mr.K.Suresh,
Respondent(s)
The Management, Matherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: V.Raji v. Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering (ID No. 20/2021) The Labour Court dismissed the petitioner's industrial dispute claim seeking reinstatement and back wages. The petitioner claimed his resignation acceptance on 14.08.2019 was victimization for strike involvement, but the court found he voluntarily resigned on 03.07.2019 and accepted the settlement without protest, failing to prove victimization allegations with evidence. The court upheld the management's position that resignation doesn't constitute illegal termination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: V.Raji v. Motherson Automotive Technologies & Engineering (ID No. 20/2021) The Labour Court dismissed the petitioner's industrial dispute claim seeking reinstatement and back wages. The petitioner claimed his resignation acceptance on 14.08.2019 was victimization for strike involvement, but the court found he voluntarily resigned on 03.07.2019 and accepted the settlement without protest, failing to prove victimization allegations with evidence. The court upheld the management's position that resignation doesn't constitute illegal termination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts