S.Dhinakaran vs The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar — 19/2021
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 14th May 2026.
ID - Industrial Disputes
CNR: TNKP180001352021
Filing Number
135/2021
Filing Date
12-03-2021
Registration No
19/2021
Registration Date
18-03-2021
Court
Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Decision Date
14th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.Dhinakaran
Adv. Mr.S.Kumarasamy, Mr.K.Bharathi, Mr.K.Suresh,
Respondent(s)
The Management, Motherson Automotive Technologies and Engineering Advocate - Mr.M. Kandasamy, Mr.P. Ashok Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-05-2026 | Judgement |
| 22-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of I.D.No. 19/2021 - S.Dinakaran v. Motherson Automotive Technologies The Labour Court awarded S.Dinakaran lump-sum compensation of Rs.40,000 instead of full reinstatement. The court found the termination during probation lacked proper performance documentation and appraisal records, though acknowledged probationers can be terminated for unsatisfactory performance. The employer failed to produce evidence justifying the poor performance claim made one week before probation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of I.D.No. 19/2021 - S.Dinakaran v. Motherson Automotive Technologies The Labour Court awarded S.Dinakaran lump-sum compensation of Rs.40,000 instead of full reinstatement. The court found the termination during probation lacked proper performance documentation and appraisal records, though acknowledged probationers can be terminated for unsatisfactory performance. The employer failed to produce evidence justifying the poor performance claim made one week before probation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts