G.Tamil Vanan vs The Management, Schwing Stretter (India) Pvt. Ltd., Advocate - MR.G.Anandakrishnan, Mr.S. Haroon Al Rasheed, Mr.R. Karthik — 24/2022

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2(A)2. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Enquiry Next hearing 23-Jun-2026 this date has passed

ID - Industrial Disputes

CNR: TNKP180000732022

Filing Number

73/2022

Filing Date

11-Apr-2022

Registration No

24/2022

Registration Date

11-Apr-2022

Court

Labour Court, Kancheepuram

Judge

1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2(A)2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G.Tamil Vanan

    Adv. C.D.Sugumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Management, Schwing Stretter (India) Pvt. Ltd., Advocate - MR.G.Anandakrishnan, Mr.S. Haroon Al Rasheed, Mr.R. Karthik

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-May-2026

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  8. 18-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  9. 21-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  10. 29-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  11. 29-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  12. 22-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  13. 17-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  14. 10-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  15. 24-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  16. 18-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  17. 14-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  18. 08-Jan-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  19. 10-Dec-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  20. 12-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  21. 18-Oct-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  22. 18-Sep-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  23. 19-Aug-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  24. 22-Jul-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  25. 02-Jul-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  26. 24-Jun-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  27. 27-May-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  28. 06-May-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  29. 03-Apr-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  30. 01-Mar-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  31. 02-Feb-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  32. 02-Jan-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  33. 05-Dec-2023

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  34. 04-Dec-2023

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  35. 31-Oct-2023

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  36. 26-Sep-2023

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  37. 28-Aug-2023

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  38. 24-Jul-2023

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  39. 26-Jun-2023

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  40. 02-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  41. 10-May-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  42. 29-Mar-2023

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: G. Tamil Vanan v. The Management, Schwing Stretter (India) Pvt. Ltd. (I.D. 24/2022) Outcome: The court permitted internal inquiry proceedings to continue while maintaining that they must comply with natural justice principles and constitutional safeguards. The court rejected the petitioner's challenges regarding procedural irregularities in the investigation. Key Facts: The petitioner, a former employee, was terminated on December 6, 2019, following an internal inquiry. He alleged the company improperly received ₹1,30,000 from a third party (Nataraj Furniture) for a second-hand loader-concrete mixer sale without authorization, and that he was falsely implicated. The internal investigation proceeded through multiple inquiry officers and culminated in termination. The petitioner challenged the fairness and legality of the inquiry process. Court Finding: While noting procedural concerns, the court held that the inquiry process, though imperfect, was substantially compliant with due process requirements and should continue as it involves questions of fact requiring full investigation rather than legal determination at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  43. 29-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  44. 20-Mar-2023

    Orders

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  45. 13-Mar-2023

    Orders

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  46. 23-Feb-2023

    Orders

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  47. 09-Feb-2023

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  48. 02-Feb-2023

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  49. 09-Jan-2023

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  50. 23-Dec-2022

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  51. 16-Dec-2022

    Appearance

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  52. 25-Nov-2022

    Appearance

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  53. 11-Nov-2022

    Appearance

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  54. 20-Oct-2022

    Written Statement

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  55. 23-Sep-2022

    Written Statement

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  56. 01-Sep-2022

    Written Statement

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  57. 03-Aug-2022

    Written Statement

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  58. 06-Jul-2022

    Written Statement

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  59. 08-Jun-2022

    Written Statement

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  60. 11-May-2022

    Vakalat / Memo of Appearance

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

  61. 11-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  62. 11-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 24/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: G. Tamil Vanan v. The Management, Schwing Stretter (India) Pvt. Ltd. (I.D. 24/2022) Outcome: The court permitted internal inquiry proceedings to continue while maintaining that they must comply with natural justice principles and constitutional safeguards. The court rejected the petitioner's challenges regarding procedural irregularities in the investigation. Key Facts: The petitioner, a former employee, was terminated on December 6, 2019, following an internal inquiry. He alleged the company improperly received ₹1,30,000 from a third party (Nataraj Furniture) for a second-hand loader-concrete mixer sale without authorization, and that he was falsely implicated. The internal investigation proceeded through multiple inquiry officers and culminated in termination. The petitioner challenged the fairness and legality of the inquiry process. Court Finding: While noting procedural concerns, the court held that the inquiry process, though imperfect, was substantially compliant with due process requirements and should continue as it involves questions of fact requiring full investigation rather than legal determination at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case