S.Madhan Raj, S/o.Srinivasan vs The Management JBM Auto Limited Advocate - K.R.Hariharan — 37/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C(2). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
CP - Claim Petition
CNR: TNKP180000682025
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
68/2025
Filing Date
03-04-2025
Registration No
37/2025
Registration Date
16-06-2025
Court
Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.Madhan Raj, S/o.Srinivasan
Adv. J.Prathaban
Respondent(s)
The Management JBM Auto Limited Advocate - K.R.Hariharan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | Part Heard |
| 27-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 07-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 25-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case 37/2025 Summary: In this Labour Court proceeding, petitioner S. Madhan Raj testified on May 15, 2026, regarding his dispute with JBM Auto Limited. The petitioner claimed he was wrongfully terminated and sought back wages (2020-2021), earned leave encashment (2021-2024), dearness allowance, and gratuity totaling ₹17,96,165. The court found the petition inadmissible as a Writ petition was already pending in case OP.33/2021 involving the same subject matter and parties. The petition was dismissed for lack of maintainability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 37/2025 Summary: In this Labour Court proceeding, petitioner S. Madhan Raj testified on May 15, 2026, regarding his dispute with JBM Auto Limited. The petitioner claimed he was wrongfully terminated and sought back wages (2020-2021), earned leave encashment (2021-2024), dearness allowance, and gratuity totaling ₹17,96,165. The court found the petition inadmissible as a Writ petition was already pending in case OP.33/2021 involving the same subject matter and parties. The petition was dismissed for lack of maintainability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts