M.A.Hafiz Rahman, S/o.Habib Rahman vs The Management JBM Auto Limited Advocate - K.R.Hariharan — 27/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C(2). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
CP - Claim Petition
CNR: TNKP180000562025
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
56/2025
Filing Date
03-04-2025
Registration No
27/2025
Registration Date
16-06-2025
Court
Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.A.Hafiz Rahman, S/o.Habib Rahman
Adv. J.Prathaban
Respondent(s)
The Management JBM Auto Limited Advocate - K.R.Hariharan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-05-2026 | Part Heard |
| 27-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 07-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 25-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In this Labour Court case CP.No. 27/2025 heard on 11.05.2026, petitioner M.A. Hafiz Rahman (witness PW1) testified regarding his employment dispute with JBM Auto Limited. The petitioner claimed wrongful termination and sought arrears of salary (₹20,03,202/-), gratuity, bonus, and other benefits for the periods 2020-2021 and 2021-2023. The court noted that a related Writ petition (OP.33/2021) is pending, which affects the present case's jurisdiction. The case was adjourned for further hearing, with the petition remaining pending before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In this Labour Court case CP.No. 27/2025 heard on 11.05.2026, petitioner M.A. Hafiz Rahman (witness PW1) testified regarding his employment dispute with JBM Auto Limited. The petitioner claimed wrongful termination and sought arrears of salary (₹20,03,202/-), gratuity, bonus, and other benefits for the periods 2020-2021 and 2021-2023. The court noted that a related Writ petition (OP.33/2021) is pending, which affects the present case's jurisdiction. The case was adjourned for further hearing, with the petition remaining pending before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts