M.Vijay, S/o.A.Munusamy vs The Management JBM Auto Limited Advocate - K.R.Hariharan — 26/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C(2). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

CP - Claim Petition

CNR: TNKP180000532025

Part Heard

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

Filing Number

53/2025

Filing Date

03-04-2025

Registration No

26/2025

Registration Date

16-06-2025

Court

Labour Court, Kancheepuram

Judge

1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

Acts & Sections

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 Section 33C(2)

Petitioner(s)

M.Vijay, S/o.A.Munusamy

Adv. J.Prathaban

Respondent(s)

The Management JBM Auto Limited Advocate - K.R.Hariharan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram

11-05-2026

Part Heard

27-04-2026

Part Heard

07-04-2026

Part Heard

12-03-2026

Part Heard

25-02-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

11-02-2026
Oral Evidence
11-05-2026
Oral Evidence

In Case 26/2025 before the Labour Court, Kancheepuram, petitioner M. Vijay testified on May 11, 2026, regarding his termination from JBM Auto Limited. Vijay claimed he was wrongfully dismissed and sought compensation of Rs. 17,96,165/- as settlement amount. The court recorded his witness statement (PW1) detailing his employment history, including 120 permanent employees and 70 workers under the respondent company, and his subsequent lack of income post-termination. The proceedings were adjourned for further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In Case 26/2025 before the Labour Court, Kancheepuram, petitioner M. Vijay testified on May 11, 2026, regarding his termination from JBM Auto Limited. Vijay claimed he was wrongfully dismissed and sought compensation of Rs. 17,96,165/- as settlement amount. The court recorded his witness statement (PW1) detailing his employment history, including 120 permanent employees and 70 workers under the respondent company, and his subsequent lack of income post-termination. The proceedings were adjourned for further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Labour Court, Kancheepuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case