M.Vijay, S/o.A.Munusamy vs The Management JBM Auto Limited Advocate - K.R.Hariharan — 26/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C(2). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
CP - Claim Petition
CNR: TNKP180000532025
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
53/2025
Filing Date
03-04-2025
Registration No
26/2025
Registration Date
16-06-2025
Court
Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.Vijay, S/o.A.Munusamy
Adv. J.Prathaban
Respondent(s)
The Management JBM Auto Limited Advocate - K.R.Hariharan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-05-2026 | Part Heard |
| 27-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 07-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 25-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
In Case 26/2025 before the Labour Court, Kancheepuram, petitioner M. Vijay testified on May 11, 2026, regarding his termination from JBM Auto Limited. Vijay claimed he was wrongfully dismissed and sought compensation of Rs. 17,96,165/- as settlement amount. The court recorded his witness statement (PW1) detailing his employment history, including 120 permanent employees and 70 workers under the respondent company, and his subsequent lack of income post-termination. The proceedings were adjourned for further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In Case 26/2025 before the Labour Court, Kancheepuram, petitioner M. Vijay testified on May 11, 2026, regarding his termination from JBM Auto Limited. Vijay claimed he was wrongfully dismissed and sought compensation of Rs. 17,96,165/- as settlement amount. The court recorded his witness statement (PW1) detailing his employment history, including 120 permanent employees and 70 workers under the respondent company, and his subsequent lack of income post-termination. The proceedings were adjourned for further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts