Chennai Yetrumathi Valaga Oozhiyargal Matrum pothu Thozhilalargal Sangam vs The Management of Venture Lighting India Limited Advocate - G.Anandakrishnan, S.Haroon Al Rasheed (AGAM LEGAL) — 21/2022
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2-A(2). Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 15th April 2026.
ID - Industrial Disputes
CNR: TNKP180000362022
Filing Number
36/2022
Filing Date
03-03-2022
Registration No
21/2022
Registration Date
03-03-2022
Court
Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CLOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chennai Yetrumathi Valaga Oozhiyargal Matrum pothu Thozhilalargal Sangam
Adv. Mr.J. Prathaban, Mr.S. Rudranath
Respondent(s)
The Management of Venture Lighting India Limited Advocate - G.Anandakrishnan, S.Haroon Al Rasheed (AGAM LEGAL)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram
Disposed
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Await Reports |
| 08-04-2026 | Await Reports |
| 26-03-2026 | Await Reports |
| 18-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Labor Court, Kanchipuram dismissed a case filed by the Chennai Export Processing Zone Workers Union against Venture Lighting India Limited regarding the transfer of workers to Gujarat. The court found that the company had transferred workers in violation of labor standards and that management failed to consult with union representatives, but the case was ultimately closed based on a joint settlement agreed upon by both parties on March 16, 2026, under Section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Labor Court, Kanchipuram dismissed a case filed by the Chennai Export Processing Zone Workers Union against Venture Lighting India Limited regarding the transfer of workers to Gujarat. The court found that the company had transferred workers in violation of labor standards and that management failed to consult with union representatives, but the case was ultimately closed based on a joint settlement agreed upon by both parties on March 16, 2026, under Section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts