R.Gunasekaran vs S.Manoharan — 100402/2014

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1ofCPC. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

IA Pending Next hearing 09-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit (Title)

CNR: TNKP120026002014

Filing Number

100402/2014

Filing Date

04-Sep-2014

Registration No

100402/2014

Registration Date

04-Sep-2014

Court

District Munsif Court, Sriperumbudur

Judge

1-District Munsif

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1ofCPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R.Gunasekaran

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S.Manoharan

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  7. 28-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  8. 10-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  9. 03-Jul-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  10. 28-Apr-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  11. 27-Mar-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  12. 03-Feb-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  13. 09-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  14. 17-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  15. 09-Sep-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  16. 12-Jul-2024

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  17. 27-Mar-2024

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  18. 22-Jan-2024

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  19. 12-Dec-2023

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  20. 22-Nov-2023

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  21. 17-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  22. 21-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  23. 08-Aug-2023

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: OS No. 402/2014, IA No. 01/2022 The District Munsif Court at Sriperumbudur allowed the petitioner's application to condone a delay of 1316 days in filing the petition to set aside abatement of suit. The petitioner attributed the delay to gathering particulars of proposed parties, claiming it was neither willful nor wanton. Although respondents contested, arguing the suit was based on a fabricated 1988 sale agreement and that no serious reason justified the delay, the court found no substantial objection during inquiry and granted the relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  24. 08-Aug-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  25. 10-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  26. 12-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  27. 12-Apr-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  28. 04-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  29. 21-Feb-2023

    Steps

    District Munsif

  30. 12-Jan-2023

    Steps

    District Munsif

  31. 15-Dec-2022

    Steps

    District Munsif

  32. 07-Dec-2022

    Steps

    District Munsif

  33. 09-Nov-2022

    Steps

    District Munsif

  34. 28-Sep-2022

    Steps

    District Munsif

  35. 01-Aug-2022

    Steps

    District Munsif

  36. 28-Jun-2022

    Steps

    District Munsif

  37. 30-Mar-2022

    Steps

    District Munsif

  38. 14-Feb-2022

    Steps

    District Munsif

  39. 15-Dec-2021

    Steps

    District Munsif

  40. 29-Oct-2021

    Steps

    District Munsif

  41. 17-Sep-2021

    Steps

    District Munsif

  42. 27-Jul-2021

    Steps

    District Munsif

  43. 16-Jun-2021

    Steps

    District Munsif

  44. 08-Apr-2021

    Steps

    District Munsif

  45. 02-Nov-2020

    Steps

    District Munsif

  46. 09-Jun-2020

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  47. 25-Feb-2020

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  48. 09-Jan-2020

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  49. 25-Oct-2019

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  50. 22-Oct-2019

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  51. 09-Sep-2019

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  52. 02-Jul-2019

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  53. 24-Apr-2019

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  54. 18-Mar-2019

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  55. 07-Feb-2019

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  56. 17-Dec-2018

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  57. 20-Nov-2018

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  58. 24-Sep-2018

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  59. 04-Aug-2018

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  60. 01-Aug-2018

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  61. 17-Jul-2018

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  62. 13-Apr-2018

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  63. 27-Mar-2018

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  64. 19-Dec-2017

    Steps

    District Munsif

  65. 14-Nov-2017

    Steps

    District Munsif

  66. 24-Aug-2017

    Steps

    District Munsif

  67. 20-Jun-2017

    Steps

    District Munsif

  68. 25-Apr-2017

    Steps

    District Munsif

  69. 14-Feb-2017

    Steps

    District Munsif

  70. 28-Nov-2016

    Steps

    District Munsif

  71. 20-Sep-2016

    Steps

    District Munsif

  72. 26-Jul-2016

    Steps

    District Munsif

  73. 06-Jun-2016

    Steps

    District Munsif

  74. 07-Apr-2016

    Steps

    District Munsif

  75. 28-Jan-2016

    Steps

    District Munsif

  76. 19-Nov-2015

    Steps

    District Munsif

  77. 08-Sep-2015

    Steps

    District Munsif

  78. 29-Jun-2015

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  79. 09-Jun-2015

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  80. 20-Apr-2015

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  81. 06-Jan-2015

    Vakalat / Memo of Appearance

    District Munsif

  82. 17-Nov-2014

    Vakalat / Memo of Appearance

    District Munsif

  83. 24-Sep-2014

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  84. 04-Sep-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100402/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 402/2014, IA No. 01/2022 The District Munsif Court at Sriperumbudur allowed the petitioner's application to condone a delay of 1316 days in filing the petition to set aside abatement of suit. The petitioner attributed the delay to gathering particulars of proposed parties, claiming it was neither willful nor wanton. Although respondents contested, arguing the suit was based on a fabricated 1988 sale agreement and that no serious reason justified the delay, the court found no substantial objection during inquiry and granted the relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case