Arul Anandhi and 2 others vs Raja Pushpam and 3 others Advocate - S.Desai — 165/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1ofCPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNKP120008192016
Filing Number
165/2016
Filing Date
27-Apr-2016
Registration No
165/2016
Registration Date
27-Apr-2016
Court
District Munsif Court, Sriperumbudur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Arul Anandhi and 2 others
Adv. D.Thanigai Vasan and S.Ranjith kumar
-
2.Yese Chakaravarthi
-
3.Kennady
Respondent(s)
-
1.Raja Pushpam and 3 others Advocate - S.Desai
-
2.Nallathambi
-
3.Arul Jayam
-
4.Arul Rasathi
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
02-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
02-Feb-2026
Oral EvidenceView PDF
Case 165/2016 - District Munsif Court, Sriperumbudur: First witness (Kennady, age 42) was examined on February 2, 2026, and eight documentary exhibits were admitted into evidence including correspondence and postal acknowledgments from January-February 2016. The witness examination was adjourned pending cross-examination by the respondents' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Feb-2026
Trial
District Munsif
-
23-Jan-2026
Trial
District Munsif
-
17-Dec-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
06-Nov-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
18-Sep-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
15-Jul-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
19-Jun-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
03-Apr-2025
Oral EvidenceView PDF
-
03-Apr-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
09-Jan-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
10-Dec-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
23-Sep-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
16-Jul-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
01-Apr-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
13-Feb-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
02-Dec-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
25-Sep-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
27-Jul-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
22-Jun-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
20-Apr-2023
Issues
District Munsif
-
12-Jan-2023
Issues
District Munsif
-
16-Nov-2022
Issues
District Munsif
-
14-Sep-2022
Issues
District Munsif
-
22-Jul-2022
Issues
District Munsif
-
22-Mar-2022
Issues
District Munsif
-
15-Feb-2022
Issues
District Munsif
-
22-Sep-2021
Issues
District Munsif
-
16-Jul-2021
Issues
District Munsif
-
28-Apr-2021
Issues
District Munsif
-
18-Mar-2021
Issues
District Munsif
-
03-Oct-2020
Issues
District Munsif
-
01-Oct-2020
Issues
District Munsif
-
20-May-2020
Issues
District Munsif
-
30-Apr-2020
Issues
District Munsif
-
11-Feb-2020
Issues
District Munsif
-
05-Nov-2019
Issues
District Munsif
-
18-Jul-2019
Issues
District Munsif
-
29-Apr-2019
Issues
District Munsif
-
28-Jan-2019
Issues
District Munsif
-
15-Nov-2018
Issues
District Munsif
-
28-Aug-2018
Issues
District Munsif
-
21-Jun-2018
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
03-Apr-2018
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
08-Jan-2018
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
05-Oct-2017
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
18-Jul-2017
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
05-Jun-2017
Issues
District Munsif
-
28-Feb-2017
Issues
District Munsif
-
24-Jan-2017
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
08-Dec-2016
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
27-Sep-2016
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
09-Aug-2016
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
14-Jun-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Apr-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 165/2016
Case 165/2016 - District Munsif Court, Sriperumbudur: First witness (Kennady, age 42) was examined on February 2, 2026, and eight documentary exhibits were admitted into evidence including correspondence and postal acknowledgments from January-February 2016. The witness examination was adjourned pending cross-examination by the respondents' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts