D. Srinivasan, vs M. Pommi and one another, — 130/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKP120007622020

Filing Number

317/2020

Filing Date

11-Dec-2020

Registration No

130/2020

Registration Date

21-Dec-2020

Court

District Munsif Court, Sriperumbudur

Judge

1-District Munsif

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.D. Srinivasan,

    Adv. SIVAPRAKASH.K, SENTHIL.K,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M. Pommi and one another,

  2. 2.Murugaiyan,

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

    Case 130/2020 Summary Petitioner: D. Srinivasan Respondents: M. Pommi and Murugaiyan Date: 07.04.2026 Outcome: The case proceeded with cross-examination of PW1 (witness). The witness testified regarding a property dispute involving plot numbers 67 and 68 (6,995 sq. ft. land), disputing claims about construction by respondents and denying the respondents' ownership rights. No re-examination was conducted. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  8. 20-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  9. 23-Oct-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  10. 18-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  11. 07-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  12. 15-Jul-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  13. 04-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  14. 17-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  15. 21-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  16. 14-Mar-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  17. 28-Feb-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  18. 28-Jan-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  19. 13-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  20. 28-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  21. 22-Aug-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  22. 20-Jun-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  23. 10-Apr-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  24. 05-Feb-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  25. 24-Nov-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  26. 04-Oct-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  27. 07-Aug-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  28. 03-Jun-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  29. 30-Jan-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  30. 14-Dec-2022

    Issues

    District Munsif

  31. 27-Sep-2022

    Issues

    District Munsif

  32. 04-Aug-2022

    Issues

    District Munsif

  33. 16-Jun-2022

    Issues

    District Munsif

  34. 24-Feb-2022

    Issues

    District Munsif

  35. 30-Sep-2021

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  36. 27-Jul-2021

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  37. 29-Apr-2021

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  38. 10-Mar-2021

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  39. 27-Jan-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 11-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 130/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case 130/2020 Summary Petitioner: D. Srinivasan Respondents: M. Pommi and Murugaiyan Date: 07.04.2026 Outcome: The case proceeded with cross-examination of PW1 (witness). The witness testified regarding a property dispute involving plot numbers 67 and 68 (6,995 sq. ft. land), disputing claims about construction by respondents and denying the respondents' ownership rights. No re-examination was conducted. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case