Nagalingam vs Vijayalakshmi ANOTHER Advocate - D. Muthurangan — 100041/2009

Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit (Title)

CNR: TNKP120003202009

Filing Number

100041/2009

Filing Date

03-Mar-2009

Registration No

100041/2009

Registration Date

03-Mar-2009

Court

District Munsif Court, Sriperumbudur

Judge

1-District Munsif

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 28-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nagalingam

    Adv. M.B. Velmurugan,N. Shanmughasundaram,M.Santhosam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vijayalakshmi ANOTHER Advocate - D. Muthurangan

  2. 2.Selvamani

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Nagalingam v. Vijayalakshmi (O.S. No. 41 of 2009) The District Munsif, Sriperumbudur dismissed plaintiff Nagalingam's suit seeking permanent injunction against defendants to prevent encroachment on his agricultural land. Although the court found the plaintiff was the lawful owner with valid title to the suit properties (through inheritance and settlement deed), it rejected the injunction claim because the plaintiff provided incorrect property boundaries and survey numbers in the plaint. An advocate commissioner's inspection found no actual encroachment, contradicting the plaintiff's allegations. The court held that without properly identified property boundaries, the encroachment claim could not be substantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  10. 01-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  11. 19-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  12. 17-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  13. 09-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  14. 01-Jul-2025

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  15. 01-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  16. 24-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  17. 20-Jun-2025

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  18. 20-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  19. 16-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  20. 23-Apr-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  21. 15-Apr-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  22. 04-Apr-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  23. 25-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  24. 11-Mar-2025

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  25. 11-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  26. 04-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  27. 14-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  28. 04-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  29. 07-Jan-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  30. 02-Dec-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  31. 28-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  32. 04-Sep-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  33. 03-Aug-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  34. 06-Jul-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  35. 16-Apr-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  36. 01-Mar-2024

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  37. 01-Mar-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  38. 06-Feb-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  39. 05-Dec-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  40. 31-Oct-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  41. 13-Sep-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  42. 25-Jul-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  43. 07-Jul-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  44. 06-Jun-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  45. 30-Mar-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  46. 04-Feb-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  47. 16-Dec-2022

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  48. 10-Nov-2022

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  49. 29-Sep-2022

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  50. 30-Aug-2022

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  51. 13-Jul-2022

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  52. 21-Jun-2022

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  53. 11-Apr-2022

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  54. 11-Mar-2022

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  55. 11-Jan-2022

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  56. 08-Dec-2021

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  57. 09-Nov-2021

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  58. 21-Sep-2021

    Issues

    District Munsif

  59. 11-Aug-2021

    Issues

    District Munsif

  60. 28-Jul-2021

    Issues

    District Munsif

  61. 23-Jun-2021

    Issues

    District Munsif

  62. 31-Mar-2021

    Issues

    District Munsif

  63. 06-Oct-2020

    Issues

    District Munsif

  64. 01-Jun-2020

    Issues

    District Munsif

  65. 13-Feb-2020

    Issues

    District Munsif

  66. 07-Nov-2019

    Issues

    District Munsif

  67. 22-Jul-2019

    Issues

    District Munsif

  68. 18-Jun-2019

    Issues

    District Munsif

  69. 05-Mar-2019

    Issues

    District Munsif

  70. 13-Dec-2018

    Issues

    District Munsif

  71. 27-Sep-2018

    Issues

    District Munsif

  72. 14-Aug-2018

    Issues

    District Munsif

  73. 07-Jul-2018

    Issues

    District Munsif

  74. 18-Jun-2018

    Issues

    District Munsif

  75. 12-Jun-2018

    Issues

    District Munsif

  76. 13-Mar-2018

    Issues

    District Munsif

  77. 21-Feb-2018

    Issues

    District Munsif

  78. 08-Feb-2018

    Issues

    District Munsif

  79. 03-Jan-2018

    Issues

    District Munsif

  80. 08-Dec-2017

    Issues

    District Munsif

  81. 22-Nov-2017

    Counter

    District Munsif

  82. 03-Nov-2017

    Counter

    District Munsif

  83. 04-Oct-2017

    Counter

    District Munsif

  84. 30-Aug-2017

    Counter

    District Munsif

  85. 21-Aug-2017

    Counter

    District Munsif

  86. 17-Jun-2017

    Counter

    District Munsif

  87. 20-Apr-2017

    Counter

    District Munsif

  88. 07-Feb-2017

    Counter

    District Munsif

  89. 20-Dec-2016

    Counter

    District Munsif

  90. 17-Oct-2016

    Counter

    District Munsif

  91. 18-Aug-2016

    Counter

    District Munsif

  92. 21-Jun-2016

    Counter

    District Munsif

  93. 28-Apr-2016

    Counter

    District Munsif

  94. 28-Mar-2016

    Counter

    District Munsif

  95. 11-Jan-2016

    Counter

    District Munsif

  96. 02-Nov-2015

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  97. 15-Sep-2015

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  98. 06-Jul-2015

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  99. 09-Apr-2015

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  100. 05-Feb-2015

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  101. 17-Nov-2014

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  102. 17-Jul-2014

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  103. 09-Jun-2014

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  104. 10-Apr-2014

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  105. 25-Jan-2014

    Issues

  106. 03-Dec-2013

    Issues

  107. 07-Oct-2013

    Issues

  108. 25-Jul-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  109. 03-Mar-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100041/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Nagalingam v. Vijayalakshmi (O.S. No. 41 of 2009) The District Munsif, Sriperumbudur dismissed plaintiff Nagalingam's suit seeking permanent injunction against defendants to prevent encroachment on his agricultural land. Although the court found the plaintiff was the lawful owner with valid title to the suit properties (through inheritance and settlement deed), it rejected the injunction claim because the plaintiff provided incorrect property boundaries and survey numbers in the plaint. An advocate commissioner's inspection found no actual encroachment, contradicting the plaintiff's allegations. The court held that without properly identified property boundaries, the encroachment claim could not be substantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case