S.Chandrasekar vs N.Suresh — 14/2016

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1and26ofCPC. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

IA Pending Next hearing 06-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit (Title)

CNR: TNKP120001812016

Filing Number

14/2016

Filing Date

21-Jan-2016

Registration No

14/2016

Registration Date

21-Jan-2016

Court

District Munsif Court, Sriperumbudur

Judge

1-District Munsif

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1and26ofCPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.Chandrasekar

    Adv. A.P.kannadhasan , C.Thanigaiarasu and L.Sowmiya Narayanan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.N.Suresh

Case History

  1. 06-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  6. 12-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  7. 20-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  8. 21-Jul-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  9. 20-Jun-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  10. 16-Jun-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  11. 29-Apr-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  12. 25-Mar-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  13. 18-Feb-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  14. 31-Jan-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  15. 10-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  16. 30-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  17. 19-Sep-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  18. 28-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  19. 12-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  20. 25-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  21. 29-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  22. 19-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  23. 11-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  24. 09-Nov-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  25. 13-Sep-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  26. 11-Jul-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  27. 19-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  28. 13-Jun-2023

    Restored

    District Munsif

  29. 13-Jun-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  30. 03-Jan-2017

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S.No.14/16 - S.Chandrasekar v. N.Suresh The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate at Sriperumbudur decreed the suit for permanent injunction in favor of plaintiff S.Chandrasekar on January 3, 2017. The defendant N.Suresh remained ex-parte after appearing but failing to file a written statement. The court found the plaintiff had proven possession and enjoyment of the suit property through patta and chitta documents, and that the defendant was attempting unlawful interference. The suit was decreed as prayed with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  31. 03-Jan-2017

    Disposed

    District Munsif

  32. 22-Dec-2016

    Orders

    District Munsif

  33. 18-Oct-2016

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  34. 19-Sep-2016

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  35. 25-Jul-2016

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  36. 06-Jun-2016

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  37. 26-Apr-2016

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  38. 18-Feb-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 21-Jan-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S.No.14/16 - S.Chandrasekar v. N.Suresh The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate at Sriperumbudur decreed the suit for permanent injunction in favor of plaintiff S.Chandrasekar on January 3, 2017. The defendant N.Suresh remained ex-parte after appearing but failing to file a written statement. The court found the plaintiff had proven possession and enjoyment of the suit property through patta and chitta documents, and that the defendant was attempting unlawful interference. The suit was decreed as prayed with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case