Varadhan vs Munusamy — 49/2019
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 7. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKP100013562019
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
101/2019
Filing Date
29-08-2019
Registration No
49/2019
Registration Date
29-08-2019
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthiramerur
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Varadhan
Adv. E. Santhanakrishnan
Respondent(s)
Munusamy
Sankar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 49/2019 Court: District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthiramerur Parties: Varadhan (Petitioner) v. Munusamy and Sankar (Respondents) Outcome: This document is a witness cross-examination transcript from the hearing held on 26.03.2026, not a final court order. The petitioner (Varadhan's son, Ilanggovan) testified regarding a property dispute involving survey numbers 571/7A1 and 571/7A2. The witness was extensively cross-examined on matters relating to ancestral property rights, previous litigation (OS 39/2003), and possession claims. The hearing concluded at 4:35 PM. No final judgment or order was passed in this document—it records only the evidentiary proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 49/2019 Court: District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthiramerur Parties: Varadhan (Petitioner) v. Munusamy and Sankar (Respondents) Outcome: This document is a witness cross-examination transcript from the hearing held on 26.03.2026, not a final court order. The petitioner (Varadhan's son, Ilanggovan) testified regarding a property dispute involving survey numbers 571/7A1 and 571/7A2. The witness was extensively cross-examined on matters relating to ancestral property rights, previous litigation (OS 39/2003), and possession claims. The hearing concluded at 4:35 PM. No final judgment or order was passed in this document—it records only the evidentiary proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts