Mangalakshmi W/o. Thirumal vs The Tashildar, Uthiramerur — 44/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 7, R.1,2, Sec,26. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 24th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKP100009142024
Filing Number
103/2024
Filing Date
09-12-2024
Registration No
44/2025
Registration Date
16-07-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthiramerur
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mangalakshmi W/o. Thirumal
Adv. D.Kannabiran
Minor. Lokeshwaran, Guardian mother Mangalakshmi
Respondent(s)
The Tashildar, Uthiramerur
State rep by its, The District Collector, Kancheepuram
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 26-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 12-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 19-02-2026 | Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: OS No. 44/2025 Court Decision: The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthiramerur, held that the minor Lokeshwaran (2nd petitioner) is the primary legal heir of the deceased Thirumal under the Hindu Succession Act, Section 8. The court declared the 2nd petitioner as the heir and directed the Tashildar to issue a succession certificate accordingly. The relief sought by the 1st petitioner (Mangalakshmi, the deceased's second wife) was rejected as she was ineligible to claim heirship. The court noted that the deceased's parents had predeceased him, making the son the primary heir under inheritance law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS No. 44/2025 Court Decision: The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthiramerur, held that the minor Lokeshwaran (2nd petitioner) is the primary legal heir of the deceased Thirumal under the Hindu Succession Act, Section 8. The court declared the 2nd petitioner as the heir and directed the Tashildar to issue a succession certificate accordingly. The relief sought by the 1st petitioner (Mangalakshmi, the deceased's second wife) was rejected as she was ineligible to claim heirship. The court noted that the deceased's parents had predeceased him, making the son the primary heir under inheritance law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts