Mangalakshmi W/o. Thirumal vs The Tashildar, Uthiramerur — 44/2025

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 7, R.1,2, Sec,26. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 24th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKP100009142024

Case disposed

Filing Number

103/2024

Filing Date

09-12-2024

Registration No

44/2025

Registration Date

16-07-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthiramerur

Judge

1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

24th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 7, R.1,2, Sec,26

Petitioner(s)

Mangalakshmi W/o. Thirumal

Adv. D.Kannabiran

Minor. Lokeshwaran, Guardian mother Mangalakshmi

Respondent(s)

The Tashildar, Uthiramerur

State rep by its, The District Collector, Kancheepuram

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

24-04-2026

Disposed

09-04-2026

Judgement

26-03-2026

For further Proceedings

12-03-2026

For further Proceedings

19-02-2026

Judgement

Final Orders / Judgements

24-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: OS No. 44/2025 Court Decision: The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthiramerur, held that the minor Lokeshwaran (2nd petitioner) is the primary legal heir of the deceased Thirumal under the Hindu Succession Act, Section 8. The court declared the 2nd petitioner as the heir and directed the Tashildar to issue a succession certificate accordingly. The relief sought by the 1st petitioner (Mangalakshmi, the deceased's second wife) was rejected as she was ineligible to claim heirship. The court noted that the deceased's parents had predeceased him, making the son the primary heir under inheritance law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 44/2025 Court Decision: The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthiramerur, held that the minor Lokeshwaran (2nd petitioner) is the primary legal heir of the deceased Thirumal under the Hindu Succession Act, Section 8. The court declared the 2nd petitioner as the heir and directed the Tashildar to issue a succession certificate accordingly. The relief sought by the 1st petitioner (Mangalakshmi, the deceased's second wife) was rejected as she was ineligible to claim heirship. The court noted that the deceased's parents had predeceased him, making the son the primary heir under inheritance law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthiramerur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case