Muniyammal vs Devaki — 21/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 10th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKP100001652022
Filing Number
69/2022
Filing Date
28-Apr-2022
Registration No
21/2022
Registration Date
28-Apr-2022
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthiramerur
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Muniyammal
Adv. K.Shanmugasundaram
Respondent(s)
-
1.Devaki
-
2.Sub Registrar
-
3.District collector
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Muniyammal v. Devaki and Others (O.S. No. 21/2022) The court dismissed Muniyammal's suit for permanent injunction. While the court found that a 1961 settlement deed was validly executed, it held that the plaintiff failed to prove the defendant's attempted alienation of the property and critically, failed to establish exclusive possession of the disputed Uthiramerur property—both elements necessary for injunction relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Apr-2026
Judgement
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2026
Oral EvidenceView PDF
-
21-Jan-2026
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Dec-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Oct-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Sep-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Aug-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jul-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jun-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Feb-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jan-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jan-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Nov-2024
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Nov-2024
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Sep-2024
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Aug-2024
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jul-2024
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jun-2024
Issues
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Mar-2024
Issues
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jan-2024
Issues
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Dec-2023
Issues
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Oct-2023
Issues
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Aug-2023
Issues
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jun-2023
Issues
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Apr-2023
Issues
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Mar-2023
Issues
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2023
Issues
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Dec-2022
Issues
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Dec-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Nov-2022
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Oct-2022
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Sep-2022
Counter
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jul-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 21/2022
Case Summary: Muniyammal v. Devaki and Others (O.S. No. 21/2022) The court dismissed Muniyammal's suit for permanent injunction. While the court found that a 1961 settlement deed was validly executed, it held that the plaintiff failed to prove the defendant's attempted alienation of the property and critically, failed to establish exclusive possession of the disputed Uthiramerur property—both elements necessary for injunction relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts