G.Arumugam vs R.Sampath Advocate - B.S.Ramesh — 150/2021
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section u.o.7 r.1, 26. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKP080003092021
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
416/2021
Filing Date
25-08-2021
Registration No
150/2021
Registration Date
27-08-2021
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
3-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
G.Arumugam
Adv. V.Tamilarasu
Respondent(s)
R.Sampath Advocate - B.S.Ramesh
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Principal District Munsif
Trial
Trial
Trial
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Trial |
| 01-04-2026 | Trial |
| 12-03-2026 | Trial |
| 07-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 25-02-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: G. Arumugam v. R. Sampath Advocate (O.S. No. 150/2021) Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court granted G. Arumugam leave to file additional documents in his ejectment suit, subject to admissibility, relevancy, and proof during trial. Each party bears its own costs. Key Finding: The court found no malafide intent or abuse of process despite the delayed filing of documents. The court adopted a liberal approach, noting that documents filed before trial commencement should generally be permitted when no deliberate negligence is proven, allowing the case to be decided on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: G. Arumugam v. R. Sampath Advocate (O.S. No. 150/2021) Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court granted G. Arumugam leave to file additional documents in his ejectment suit, subject to admissibility, relevancy, and proof during trial. Each party bears its own costs. Key Finding: The court found no malafide intent or abuse of process despite the delayed filing of documents. The court adopted a liberal approach, noting that documents filed before trial commencement should generally be permitted when no deliberate negligence is proven, allowing the case to be decided on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts