SARAVANAN vs RAJESWARI — 49/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order21Rule11(A). Disposed: Uncontested--Terminated on 12th March 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNKP080002122025
e-Filing Number
02-03-2025
Filing Number
212/2025
Filing Date
30-Jun-2025
Registration No
49/2025
Registration Date
03-Jul-2025
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
3-Principal District Munsif
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Terminated
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SARAVANAN
Adv. E.L.NARENDIRAKUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJESWARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case 49/2025 Summary The Principal District Munsif, Kancheepuram terminated the execution petition filed by Arjun Amaravathy Chits (P) Limited (represented by Manager A. Saravanan) against J. Rajeswari and others for recovery of Rs. 1,77,978. The decree was satisfied as confirmed by the full satisfaction memo filed by the decree holder's counsel with the manager's signature, and the execution petition was accordingly terminated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Munsif
-
26-Feb-2026
For further Proceedings
Principal District Munsif
-
03-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Munsif
-
05-Dec-2025
Issue of Service
Principal District Munsif
-
24-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
Principal District Munsif
-
12-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Principal District Munsif
-
28-Jul-2025
Issue of Service
Principal District Munsif
-
03-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 49/2025
Case 49/2025 Summary The Principal District Munsif, Kancheepuram terminated the execution petition filed by Arjun Amaravathy Chits (P) Limited (represented by Manager A. Saravanan) against J. Rajeswari and others for recovery of Rs. 1,77,978. The decree was satisfied as confirmed by the full satisfaction memo filed by the decree holder's counsel with the manager's signature, and the execution petition was accordingly terminated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts