R.Gunasekaran vs V.Vanaja and 10 others — 121/2020
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKP080002102020
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
263/2020
Filing Date
14-10-2020
Registration No
121/2020
Registration Date
16-10-2020
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
3-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R.Gunasekaran
Adv. B.Sivakumar
Respondent(s)
V.Vanaja and 10 others
S.Vajjiram
V.Senthil
Ramamoorthy
S.Saroja
V.Chamundeeswari
Rajeshwari
S.Vijayalakshmi
The Special Tahsildar
The Inspector of Survey
The District Collector
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Principal District Munsif
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 15-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 06-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 12-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 20-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 121/2020 Outcome: Petition dismissed. R. Gunasekaran sought to condone a 246-day delay in filing an application to set aside the abatement of his suit following the death of the 2nd defendant (S. Vajjiram). He cited medical treatment for eye condition as justification and sought to implead Palani, the deceased's legal heir, as the 12th defendant. The Principal District Munsif, Kancheepuram rejected the petition, finding that no cause of action arose against the proposed party at the time of suit filing (7 October 2019), and therefore Palani was not a necessary party to the permanent injunction suit against the original 8 defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. No. 121/2020 Outcome: Petition dismissed. R. Gunasekaran sought to condone a 246-day delay in filing an application to set aside the abatement of his suit following the death of the 2nd defendant (S. Vajjiram). He cited medical treatment for eye condition as justification and sought to implead Palani, the deceased's legal heir, as the 12th defendant. The Principal District Munsif, Kancheepuram rejected the petition, finding that no cause of action arose against the proposed party at the time of suit filing (7 October 2019), and therefore Palani was not a necessary party to the permanent injunction suit against the original 8 defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts