V.Manavalan vs V.Mangalakshmi — 300023/2018
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(d). Status: Mediation. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNKP080000242018
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
300023/2018
Filing Date
29-01-2018
Registration No
300023/2018
Registration Date
29-01-2018
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
3-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
V.Manavalan
Adv. P.K.Thevarajan, G.Maharaja, G.Pandurangan
Respondent(s)
V.Mangalakshmi
V.Radhakrishnan
R.usha
M.Bhuvaneswari
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Principal District Munsif
Mediation
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Mediation |
| 07-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 16-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 12-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 06-03-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S No. 23/2018 Court: Principal District Munsif, Kancheepuram Date: 03.01.2025 In this property partition dispute, petitioner V. Manavalan challenged a 2009 family partition deed on grounds that his mother (respondent V. Mangalakshmi) lacked mental capacity to execute it. The court examined the petitioner's cross-examination testimony regarding property distribution among family members and the validity of the partition document. The case involved competing claims over ancestral properties and their distribution. Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court found insufficient evidence to invalidate the partition deed, noting the petitioner failed to produce documentary proof of his mother's alleged mental incapacity at the time the deed was executed in 2009. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S No. 23/2018 Court: Principal District Munsif, Kancheepuram Date: 03.01.2025 In this property partition dispute, petitioner V. Manavalan challenged a 2009 family partition deed on grounds that his mother (respondent V. Mangalakshmi) lacked mental capacity to execute it. The court examined the petitioner's cross-examination testimony regarding property distribution among family members and the validity of the partition document. The case involved competing claims over ancestral properties and their distribution. Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court found insufficient evidence to invalidate the partition deed, noting the petitioner failed to produce documentary proof of his mother's alleged mental incapacity at the time the deed was executed in 2009. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts