Arulmighu Lakshmi Prabanna Ramanujadas Kattalai, Rep. by its Executive Officer, vs P.Vanitha — 200028/2010

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 02-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKP070006742010

Filing Number

200028/2010

Filing Date

01-Mar-2010

Registration No

200028/2010

Registration Date

01-Mar-2010

Court

Sub Court, Kancheepuram

Judge

3-Additional Sub Judge

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arulmighu Lakshmi Prabanna Ramanujadas Kattalai, Rep. by its Executive Officer,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.P.Vanitha

  2. 2.K.Mahalingam

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: 200028/2010 Court: Additional Subordinate Court, Kancheepuram Date: 12.03.2026 This is a property dispute case involving Arulmighu Lakshmi Prabanna Ramanujadas Kattalai (a temple trust) against P. Vanitha and K. Mahalingam regarding ownership of land (Survey No. 835/1B/1B/1) measuring 800 square feet. The court examined witness testimony concerning a 1913 survey document, the temple trust's validity, property boundaries, and documents related to the sale of the property to respondent Vanitha in 2000 without proper authorization from the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department Commissioner. The court found discrepancies between the 1913 survey records and the current property claims, and questioned the legal validity of the respondent's purchase deed. Outcome: Case adjourned for further proceedings; witness cross-examination completed with the judge finding insufficient evidence regarding property ownership and questioning petitioner's standing to maintain the suit as the trust's legal status and document ownership remain disputed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  9. 24-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  10. 06-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  12. 06-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  13. 05-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  14. 28-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  15. 21-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  16. 14-Nov-2025

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  17. 14-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  18. 04-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  19. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  20. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  21. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  22. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  23. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  24. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  25. 22-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional Sub Judge

  26. 10-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional Sub Judge

  27. 24-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Additional Sub Judge

  28. 05-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Additional Sub Judge

  29. 22-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Additional Sub Judge

  30. 03-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Additional Sub Judge

  31. 18-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Additional Sub Judge

  32. 01-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Additional Sub Judge

  33. 25-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Additional Sub Judge

  34. 30-Jan-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  35. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  36. 21-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  37. 26-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  38. 19-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Additional Sub Judge

  39. 18-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Additional Sub Judge

  40. 17-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Additional Sub Judge

  41. 13-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Additional Sub Judge

  42. 06-Aug-2024

    Amendment

    Additional Sub Judge

  43. 18-Jul-2024

    IA Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  44. 04-Jun-2024

    IA Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  45. 16-Apr-2024

    IA Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  46. 19-Mar-2024

    IA Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  47. 27-Feb-2024

    Steps

    Additional Sub Judge

  48. 06-Feb-2024

    Steps

    Additional Sub Judge

  49. 04-Jan-2024

    Steps

    Additional Sub Judge

  50. 05-Dec-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  51. 28-Nov-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  52. 16-Nov-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  53. 05-Oct-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  54. 07-Sep-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  55. 03-Aug-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  56. 06-Jul-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  57. 06-Jun-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  58. 21-Mar-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  59. 14-Feb-2023

    Steps

    Additional Sub Judge

  60. 05-Jan-2023

    Steps

    Additional Sub Judge

  61. 15-Dec-2022

    Steps

    Additional Sub Judge

  62. 24-Nov-2022

    Steps

    Additional Sub Judge

  63. 10-Nov-2022

    Steps

    Additional Sub Judge

  64. 11-Oct-2022

    Steps

    Additional Sub Judge

  65. 30-Aug-2022

    Steps

    Additional Sub Judge

  66. 21-Jul-2022

    Steps

    Additional Sub Judge

  67. 16-Jun-2022

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  68. 17-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  69. 03-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  70. 25-Nov-2021

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  71. 23-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  72. 07-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  73. 12-Aug-2021

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  74. 20-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  75. 13-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  76. 08-Jun-2021

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  77. 29-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  78. 15-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  79. 31-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  80. 11-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  81. 25-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  82. 09-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  83. 02-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  84. 19-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  85. 05-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  86. 18-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  87. 11-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  88. 27-Nov-2020

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  89. 26-Nov-2020

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  90. 18-Nov-2020

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  91. 05-Nov-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  92. 01-Mar-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200028/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 200028/2010 Court: Additional Subordinate Court, Kancheepuram Date: 12.03.2026 This is a property dispute case involving Arulmighu Lakshmi Prabanna Ramanujadas Kattalai (a temple trust) against P. Vanitha and K. Mahalingam regarding ownership of land (Survey No. 835/1B/1B/1) measuring 800 square feet. The court examined witness testimony concerning a 1913 survey document, the temple trust's validity, property boundaries, and documents related to the sale of the property to respondent Vanitha in 2000 without proper authorization from the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department Commissioner. The court found discrepancies between the 1913 survey records and the current property claims, and questioned the legal validity of the respondent's purchase deed. Outcome: Case adjourned for further proceedings; witness cross-examination completed with the judge finding insufficient evidence regarding property ownership and questioning petitioner's standing to maintain the suit as the trust's legal status and document ownership remain disputed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case