Muniyammal vs Govindammal Advocate - K.Shanmugasundaram — 102/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or,VII,R,1. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 04-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit (Title)

CNR: TNKP070003132017

Filing Number

200102/2017

Filing Date

18-Apr-2017

Registration No

102/2017

Registration Date

18-Apr-2017

Court

Sub Court, Kancheepuram

Judge

3-Additional Sub Judge

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or,VII,R,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Muniyammal

    Adv. V.Agoram, G.Pachaiyappan, M.Paramasivam, P.Senthil

  2. 2.Kasthuri

    Adv. V.Agoram,G.Pachaiyappan, M.Paramasivam, P.Senthil

  3. 3.Dhanalakshmi

    Adv. V.Agoram,G.Pachaiyappan, M.Paramasivam, P.Senthil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Govindammal Advocate - K.Shanmugasundaram

  2. 2.Chithra

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

    This document is a cross-examination transcript from Additional Subordinate Judge T. Thirumal's court in Kancheepuram dated 27.02.2026 in Case 102/2017. The witness (Govindammal) testified regarding a property dispute involving petitioners Muniyammal, Kasthuri, and Dhanalakshmi concerning a house in Uttiramerur. The witness confirmed she alone resides in the disputed property, described its dimensions and ownership history through a 1968 settlement deed, and addressed questions about the family relationships and property distribution claims. The case involves competing claims over property ownership and division rights among the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  11. 03-Feb-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  12. 03-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  13. 29-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  14. 18-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  15. 06-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  16. 28-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  17. 25-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  18. 21-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  19. 14-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  20. 06-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  21. 07-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  22. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  23. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  24. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  25. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  26. 08-Jul-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  27. 12-Jun-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  28. 03-Jun-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  29. 24-Apr-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  30. 15-Apr-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  31. 05-Apr-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  32. 27-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub Judge

  33. 11-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  34. 13-Feb-2025

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  35. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  36. 21-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  37. 19-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  38. 10-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  39. 26-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  40. 07-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  41. 05-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  42. 24-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  43. 24-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  44. 29-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub Judge

  45. 08-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Additional Sub Judge

  46. 25-Jun-2024

    Trial

    Additional Sub Judge

  47. 04-Apr-2024

    Trial

    Additional Sub Judge

  48. 07-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Additional Sub Judge

  49. 03-Feb-2024

    Trial

    Additional Sub Judge

  50. 02-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Additional Sub Judge

  51. 20-Nov-2023

    Issues

    Additional Sub Judge

  52. 17-Oct-2023

    Issues

    Additional Sub Judge

  53. 12-Sep-2023

    Issues

    Additional Sub Judge

  54. 10-Aug-2023

    Publication

    Additional Sub Judge

  55. 25-Jul-2023

    Steps

    Additional Sub Judge

  56. 13-Jun-2023

    Steps

    Additional Sub Judge

  57. 28-Mar-2023

    Steps

    Additional Sub Judge

  58. 28-Feb-2023

    Steps

    Additional Sub Judge

  59. 07-Jan-2023

    Restored

    Additional Sub Judge

  60. 07-Jan-2023

    Appearance

    Additional Sub Judge

  61. 07-Jan-2023

    Appearance

    Additional Sub Judge

  62. 07-Jul-2018

    Disposed

    Principal Sub Judge

  63. 03-Mar-2018

    Issue of Process

    Principal Sub Judge

  64. 16-Dec-2017

    Issue of Process

    Principal Sub Judge

  65. 16-Sep-2017

    Issue of Process

    Principal Sub Judge

  66. 16-Jun-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  67. 18-Apr-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 102/2017

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a cross-examination transcript from Additional Subordinate Judge T. Thirumal's court in Kancheepuram dated 27.02.2026 in Case 102/2017. The witness (Govindammal) testified regarding a property dispute involving petitioners Muniyammal, Kasthuri, and Dhanalakshmi concerning a house in Uttiramerur. The witness confirmed she alone resides in the disputed property, described its dimensions and ownership history through a 1968 settlement deed, and addressed questions about the family relationships and property distribution claims. The case involves competing claims over property ownership and division rights among the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case