M Gopalakrishnan vs The Special Tahsildar LA SIPCOT Unit — 6/2025

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 64(2). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

LAOP - Land Acquisition Original Petition

CNR: TNKP060011832025

e-Filing Number

01-04-2025

Filing Number

470/2025

Filing Date

05-Apr-2025

Registration No

6/2025

Registration Date

05-Apr-2025

Court

Principal District and Sessions Court, Kancheepuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 64(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M Gopalakrishnan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Special Tahsildar LA SIPCOT Unit

  2. 2.The Managing Director SIPCOT,

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: L.A.O.P 6/2025 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The Principal District Judge found no merit in M Gopalakrishnan's petition against the Special Tahsildar and SIPCOT Managing Director. The court ruled that the respondent's testimony was properly recorded and the documents presented by the respondents were valid. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments regarding land valuation and procedural irregularities, holding that the decision should be based on the documents properly filed by the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  9. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  11. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  12. 02-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  13. 07-Nov-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  14. 24-Sep-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  15. 07-Aug-2025

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  16. 11-Jul-2025

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  17. 05-Jun-2025

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  18. 05-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 05-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: L.A.O.P 6/2025 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The Principal District Judge found no merit in M Gopalakrishnan's petition against the Special Tahsildar and SIPCOT Managing Director. The court ruled that the respondent's testimony was properly recorded and the documents presented by the respondents were valid. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments regarding land valuation and procedural irregularities, holding that the decision should be based on the documents properly filed by the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case