M Gopalakrishnan vs The Special Tahsildar (LA) SIPCOT, Unit-1, Oragadam Expansion Scheme - II, Sriperumbudur. — 7/2025

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 64(2). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

LAOP - Land Acquisition Original Petition

CNR: TNKP060011822025

e-Filing Number

01-04-2025

Filing Number

469/2025

Filing Date

05-Apr-2025

Registration No

7/2025

Registration Date

05-Apr-2025

Court

Principal District and Sessions Court, Kancheepuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 64(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M Gopalakrishnan

    Adv. SPL TAHSILDAR LA SIPCOT UNIT I OGDM EXP SCHEME II

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Special Tahsildar (LA) SIPCOT, Unit-1, Oragadam Expansion Scheme - II, Sriperumbudur.

  2. 2.The Managing Director SIPCOT

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

    In case L.A.O.P 7/2025 heard on 10.04.2026, the Principal District Judge of Kancheepuram examined evidence from the respondent (Special Tahsildar) and found procedural irregularities in the land acquisition process. The court ruled that the judgment cannot be based solely on documents submitted by respondents; proper examination of all relevant documents was required. The court set aside the proceedings and directed that no further hearing is necessary, effectively remitting the matter for proper reconsideration with appropriate documentary scrutiny. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  9. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  11. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  12. 02-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  13. 07-Nov-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  14. 24-Sep-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  15. 07-Aug-2025

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  16. 11-Jul-2025

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  17. 05-Jun-2025

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  18. 05-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 05-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In case L.A.O.P 7/2025 heard on 10.04.2026, the Principal District Judge of Kancheepuram examined evidence from the respondent (Special Tahsildar) and found procedural irregularities in the land acquisition process. The court ruled that the judgment cannot be based solely on documents submitted by respondents; proper examination of all relevant documents was required. The court set aside the proceedings and directed that no further hearing is necessary, effectively remitting the matter for proper reconsideration with appropriate documentary scrutiny. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case