M Gopalakrishnan vs The special Tahsildar LA SIPCOT unit — 8/2025

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 64(2). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

LAOP - Land Acquisition Original Petition

CNR: TNKP060011812025

e-Filing Number

01-04-2025

Filing Number

468/2025

Filing Date

05-Apr-2025

Registration No

8/2025

Registration Date

05-Apr-2025

Court

Principal District and Sessions Court, Kancheepuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 64(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M Gopalakrishnan

    Adv. SPL TAHSILDAR LA SIPCOT UNIT I OGDM EXP SCHEME II

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The special Tahsildar LA SIPCOT unit

  2. 2.The Managing Director SIOCOT

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: L.A.O.P 8/2025 M Gopalakrishnan v. Special Tahsildar LA SIPCOT Unit & Managing Director SIPCOT The Principal District Judge of Kancheepuram, hearing the appeal on 10 April 2026, found that the respondent (Special Tahsildar S. Lakshman) failed to properly examine the documents submitted by the appellant. The court criticized the respondent for not considering all relevant evidence and documents in the case record. The judgment was set aside, and the case was remitted for reconsideration with proper examination of all documentary evidence before rendering a final decision. No further hearing is required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  9. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  11. 09-Jan-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  12. 09-Jan-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  13. 09-Jan-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  14. 09-Jan-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  15. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  16. 02-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  17. 07-Nov-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  18. 24-Sep-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  19. 07-Aug-2025

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  20. 11-Jul-2025

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  21. 05-Jun-2025

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  22. 05-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 05-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: L.A.O.P 8/2025 M Gopalakrishnan v. Special Tahsildar LA SIPCOT Unit & Managing Director SIPCOT The Principal District Judge of Kancheepuram, hearing the appeal on 10 April 2026, found that the respondent (Special Tahsildar S. Lakshman) failed to properly examine the documents submitted by the appellant. The court criticized the respondent for not considering all relevant evidence and documents in the case record. The judgment was set aside, and the case was remitted for reconsideration with proper examination of all documentary evidence before rendering a final decision. No further hearing is required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case